bob@tinman.cis.ohio-state.edu (Bob Sutterfield) (04/11/89)
In article <947@itivax.iti.org> scs@vax3.iti.org (Steve Simmons) writes: In article <FAULKNER.89Apr10165918@jmullins.harvard.edu> faulkner@jmullins.harvard.edu (Don Faulkner) writes: >Is it time for "gnu.d" or "gnu.politics"?? Long past, actually. Is there anyone 'officially' in charge of the gnu groups? We could always start a 'creation/destruction' discussion :-) :-) :-) Please move this discussion discussion to gnu.config. It is inappropriate for gnu.gcc/info-gcc. I've directed followups accordingly.
gore@eecs.nwu.edu (Jacob Gore) (04/11/89)
In article <947@itivax.iti.org> scs@vax3.iti.org (Steve Simmons) writes: In article <FAULKNER.89Apr10165918@jmullins.harvard.edu> faulkner@jmullins.harvard.edu (Don Faulkner) writes: >Is it time for "gnu.d" or "gnu.politics"?? Long past, actually. Is there anyone 'officially' in charge of the gnu groups? We could always start a 'creation/destruction' discussion :-) :-) :-) Yeah... Let's call it "gnu.meta" Jacob