[can.uucp] InterEUnet -- networking in Europe

lee@sq.sq.com (Liam R. E. Quin) (12/16/89)

After several people expressed interest in te state of Unix netwoorknib in
Europe, here is a message I received from the adminstrivia department at ukc,
the UK mail/news gateway.  I shall present it without comment, except to point
out that the notation #18000 means "Eighteen thousad pounds sterling", an
amount of money.

Lee

|From ukc.ac.uk!uknet Wed Nov 22 02:38:53 1989
Received: by sq.sq.com id 2207; Wed, 22 Nov 89 02:38:29 EST
From:	uiucdcs!NSFNET-RELAY.AC.UK!cu.warwick.ac.uk!ukc.ac.uk!uknet
Received: from relay.cs.net by a.cs.uiuc.edu with SMTP
	(5.61+/IDA-1.2.8) id AA05790; Tue, 21 Nov 89 10:04:30 -0600
Received: from nsfnet-relay.ac.uk by RELAY.CS.NET id ai00263; 21 Nov 89 9:33 EST
Received: from sun.nsfnet-relay.ac.uk by vax.NSFnet-Relay.AC.UK 
           via Janet with NIFTP  id aa02452; 20 Nov 89 11:09 GMT
Received: from snow by sol.warwick.ac.uk; Mon, 20 Nov 89 11:13:41 GMT
Received: from ukc.ac.uk by kestrel.Ukc.AC.UK   List Processor  id aa05856;
          18 Oct 89 15:28 BST
To:	uiucdcs!ukc.ac.uk!uknet-admins
Subject: This in sent ONLY to Commercial UKnet Sites
From:	Peter Houlder <uiucdcs!ukc.ac.uk!uknet>
Address: Computing Laboratory, University of Kent, Canterbury, Kent, UK.
Phone: +44 227 764000 x7568
Fax: +44 227 762811 (G3)
Date:	Wed, 18 Oct 89 11:26:33 EDT
Message-Id: <5768.624723993@kestrel>



                        TCP/IP Services via ukc





1.  Disclaimer

This is an initial survey to gain an idea of which existing UKnet  sites
might  be  interested in TCP/IP based services, should these be provided
by ukc. It does NOT imply that we are committed to  offering  such  ser-
vices, but these services are unlikely to be actively considered without
the positive response of UKnet sites.

No response WILL be considered as no interest.

Finally If you don't have time to read the whole text please don't  read
it at all, as parts taken out of context will give a wrong impression.


2.  The US InterNet

The US Government funds the US InterNet to support networking activities
for  academic and R&D activities. It does not support commercial activi-
ties.

Fully Connected Status to the US InterNet gives full  access  for  SMTP,
FTP, NNTP, Telnet etc ...
It is only available to sites that satisfy the above criteria.


3.  The European InterEUnet

EUnet supported by the EUUG is developing a TCP/IP based network for its
backbone  sites.   It  is hoped that EUUG co-operation with, and support
for, EUnet will speed up the development of leased line backbone connec-
tivity.   Many  of the backbones, this will shortly include ukc, already
have fully connected status to the US InterNet. It is expected that  all
backbone  sites  in  Western  Europe  will  have this status in the near
future.

This backbone network will be  the  hub  of  InterEUnet.   The  existing
TCP/IP connections to this network are summarised in my EUnet article in
the latest EUUG Newsletter,  Vol 9 No 3 Autumn 1989.  The range of Euro-
pean  Interconnectivity  will  initially  be  heavily biased towards the
larger sites within the larger EUnet national networks.  This is a deli-
berate  policy  to generate the finance required to support both smaller
national networks and smaller sites.  The exact details of this  phasing
will be decided at a technical meeting for all EUnet backbones scheduled
for Nov 20-21st this year.  More details will therefore be  given  after
this meeting, at the Dec 11-13th Cardiff Meeting.


4.  Connection to InterEUnet

There are 3 factors to consider with regard to connection:

4.1.  Status of Connection

a) US InterNet and InterEUnet for sites that satisfy US criteria and are
EUUG/EUnet members.

b) InterEUnet for sites that are EUUG/EUnet members.  This also includes
connectivity  to  a  growing  number  of sites outside Europe.  Even for
those that do not  satisfy US InterNet criteria, InterEUnet will provide
direct  access  to  uunet,  whose  archive  services  for  public domain
software are already quite comprehensive and are  expected  to  be  even
more  so in the future.  Organisations without connected status may also
get connectivity with US partners without using NSFnet at all by  making
special arrangements.

4.2.  Method of Connection

a) Leased Line
b) Over X25
c) Using SLIP over dialup lines

4.3.  Category of Connexion

a) Large Commercial
b) Small Commercial

4.4.  Proposed Initial Tariffs in Holland and France

a) Commercial 15-18000 ECU per year

An ECU is roughly equivalent to a US dollar (actually 1.41 ECU to pound)
and the charge will cover News, Mail and all available high-level TCP/IP
protocols.  In addition to the above network charges  sites  would  also
have  to  pay  the  common carrier charges involved in reaching national
backbones.

The above are the suggestions for Europe,  UK  charges  are  yet  to  be
decided.   Ukc  costs  after the first year may well be less than in the
second year.  If more sites join, then overall costs may  well  be  less
even  in  the  early  year(s).   Unfortunately this is a chicken-and-egg
situation.  We cannnot give you real estimates of  cost  until  we  have
some  idea  of your interest. You cannot confirm your interest until you
know real costs, hence this questionaire

Sites running leased lines direct to ukc may of course be able to  share
the  cost of both the ukc line and router/switching equipment with other
sites, which they service. In this way a hub of top level UK sites could
be  established.  As  an example of cost sharing, six people each having
9.6k of a 64k line may find that their costs are  about  half  the  cost
involved in a personal 9.6k line.


5.  Basis of Charges

The charges will be high at first, which means that initial participants
are  likely  to be large organisations. The high charging scale is deli-
berate, as the cost of funding leased line backbone support  along  with
the  funding  of  TCP/IP routers and switches will be N00000 ECUs, where
the scale of N will be clearer after negotiation with suppliers.

InterEUnet intends to do things correctly  thereby  providing  a  proper
European  service.   It  cannot do this without charging the cost to its
users.


6.  Phases

The first phase will be based on large users with  leased-line/X25  con-
nectivity.  Later  phases  will hopefully extend this service to smaller
sites with  X25/dialup  connectivity.   The  latter  will  also  involve
investment in terminal concentrators and modems.


7.  Migration to OSI

Running side by side with TCP/IP developments in  Europe  is  the  whole
field  of OSI development.  Ukc sees no contradiction in the development
of OSI and TCP/IP services and is actively seeking  help  in  developing
The  ISODE  package has in fact proved very valuable in implementing OSI
applications, making TCP/IP services (almost) a natural way for  a  gra-
dual  and  smooth  transition to OSI services.  X400/X500 services ( all
offers  will  be  favourably  considered).   This  is  however   another
chicken-and-egg  situation.   UKnet  is self supporting so investment in
these services must be funded.  TCP/IP can offer  immediate  advantages,
because  it  is here and it works.  OSI will offer more when it arrives,
but at present it offers neither a large range of facilities nor a  wide
geographical connectivity.

Investment in TCP/IP will provide a leased line framework, which has the
ability  to  take  on OSI protocols as and when available.  There are no
religious feelings towards OSI or TCP/IP within the UKnet support  group
at  ukc.   We  simply want to provide the best services available at any
moment in time.


8.  Cardiff Meeting Dec 11-13th

This meeting will be longer than usual with 2 full days of talks  and  1
or  2 half day tutorials.  It is intended to use this time to update all
attendees with the latest OSI  and  TCP/IP  developments.   Please  note
these dates in your diary. More details will follow later.


9.  Action needed by recipient of this email

Please detach the below  and  return  to  uknet@ukc,  using  a  Subject:
InterEUnet
Please denote level of interest on a scale 0-5, with 0  as  no  interest
and 5 showing a definite high-level of interest.


- ------- DETACH AND RETURN to uknet@ukc -------

Uucp-site-name:

Contact-name:

Electronic-Address:

Status of Connexion sought (1 or 2):
    1 - InterNet and InterEUnet, 2 - InterEUnet only

Method-of-Connexion (please state interest level 0 - 5 )
Leased-Line( 0-5 ):
X25( 0-5 ):
Dialup( 0-5 ):

Category of Site ( 1 or 2 )
    1 - Large Commercial, 2 - Small Commercial

Comments (Take as much space as you need):

- ------------------------------------------------------------------------

- ------------------------------------------------------------------------

- ------------------------------------------------------------------------

- ------------------------------------------------------------------------

- ------------------------------------------------------------------------

- ------------------------------------------------------------------------

- ------------------------------------------------------------------------

- ------------------------------------------------------------------------

- ------------------------------------------------------------------------

- ------------------------------------------------------------------------

- ------------------------------------------------------------------------

- ------------------------------------------------------------------------

- ------------------------------------------------------------------------

- ------------------------------------------------------------------------


End of forwarded message.
Lee
-- 
Liam R. Quin, lee@sq.com Until Dec. 20th  (visiting sq, not an employee)
After Dec 20, Unixsys (UK) Ltd, Knutsford, UK -- +44 565 50021
At home: +44 925 831084 (0830 GMT to midnight GMT only please...)
rn: .signature: cannot open: no such fire or dirigible