ralph@laas.fr (Ralph P. Sobek) (08/13/90)
Does anyone know what patches are necessary for that UKTeX postings to comp.text.tex can be read as digests. Neither gnus nor rmail seem to be able handle this format. Or maybe the UKTeX Digest could change their format? I do not know what the differences are. -- Ralph P. Sobek Disclaimer: The above ruminations are my own. ralph@laas.fr Addresses are ordered by importance. ralph@laas.uucp, or ...!uunet!laas!ralph If all else fails, try: sobek@eclair.Berkeley.EDU =============================================================================== Reliable software should kill people reliably! -Andy Mickel, Pascal News #13,78
spqr@ecs.soton.ac.uk (Sebastian Rahtz) (08/16/90)
In article <RALPH.90Aug13161937@orion.laas.fr> ralph@laas.fr (Ralph P. Sobek) writes:
Does anyone know what patches are necessary for that UKTeX postings to
comp.text.tex can be read as digests. Neither gnus nor rmail seem to
be able handle this format. Or maybe the UKTeX Digest could change
apologies on behalf of the UK TeX Archive team. We will discuss this
and see what we can do to make our output compatible with `bursters'.
no guarentees though. I should point out that all the maintenance etc
is done on a Vax under VMS, so don't offer to send us clever Unix
software...
sebastian
--
Sebastian Rahtz S.Rahtz@uk.ac.soton.ecs (JANET)
Computer Science S.Rahtz@ecs.soton.ac.uk (Bitnet)
Southampton S09 5NH, UK S.Rahtz@sot-ecs.uucp (uucp)