g_ahrendt@vaxa.uwa.oz (Gunter Ahrendt) (06/08/90)
I was very interested to read about the GF11, and would like to know if you could provide similar postings for the RP-3 & TF-1. I am very sure most comp.sys.super readers would be very interested :)
sysmgr@KING.ENG.UMD.EDU (Doug Mohney) (06/08/90)
In article <1990Jun8.114052.1879@vaxa.uwa.oz>, g_ahrendt@vaxa.uwa.oz (Gunter Ahrendt) writes: >I was very interested to read about the GF11, and would like to know if you >could provide similar postings for the RP-3 & TF-1. I am very sure most >comp.sys.super readers would be very interested :) And then the Olympic Committee can hand out the medals for fastest vector machine, all-around performance, and fastest special processing machine. "But how do we get our Cray to Athens, boss?"
ciotti@wilbur.nas.nasa.gov (Robert B. Ciotti) (06/09/90)
In article <00937E29.EA6F7B80@KING.ENG.UMD.EDU> sysmgr@KING.ENG.UMD.EDU (Doug Mohney) writes: >In article <1990Jun8.114052.1879@vaxa.uwa.oz>, g_ahrendt@vaxa.uwa.oz (Gunter Ahrendt) writes: >>I was very interested to read about the GF11, and would like to know if you > >And then the Olympic Committee can hand out the medals for fastest >vector machine, all-around performance, and fastest special processing >machine. Hearsay has it that advanced compiler development is in the works, a true automatic vectorizing, parallelizing cobol compiler. Eugene even said that report generation could be distributed across several printers! -{(:'|)>- > "But how do we get our Cray to Athens, boss?" HSX of course