eho@clarity.Princeton.EDU (Eric Ho) (09/11/89)
How much work is it to keep the existing design/organisation of gcc as it is now but make it to be able to read/load in architectural info (hence overiding the default values of various macros) as the user chooses to ? If the user doesn't raise the flag then gcc will be the same as before -- i.e. it should impose no performance penalties. I know that reading in this kind of info will slow the compiler down to a certain extent but I thought that it'll be nice if the user can at least have a choice. This feature I guess will of some help to people who are designing/using new machines/architectures or simply adding a new processor to an existing family -- this helps/breeds experimentations -- i.e. everytime you add a new feature to the processor you just need to modify a single file and don't need to rebuild gcc in order to test things out. Oh well, just a thought ... -- Eric Ho Cognitive Science Lab., Princeton University voice = 609-258-2987 email = eho@confidence.princeton.edu 609-258-2819 (messages) eho@bogey.princeton.edu regards. -eric-