ronb@otc.oz (Ron Barrett) (08/11/88)
I'm looking for CONCISE definitions of the following Fault Tolerant
architectures.
1) tightly coupled.
& 2) loosely coupled.
Any help/discussion would be greatly appreciated. Thanks.
--
Ron Barrett
Network Development
|||| OTC ||
ACSnet: ronb@otc.oz UUCP: {uunet,mcvax}!otc.oz!ronbpeter@trlsasy.trl.oz (Peter Richardson) (08/12/88)
In article <433@otc.oz> ronb@otc.oz (Ron Barrett) writes: >I'm looking for CONCISE definitions of the following Fault Tolerant >architectures. > 1) tightly coupled. > & 2) loosely coupled. > >Any help/discussion would be greatly appreciated. Thanks. I have found that the following seems to work for most systems: Loosely Coupled: each processor has its own local memory and IO resources. Tightly Coupled: processors are not bound to particular memory or IO resources (implies high bandwidth interconnections). To get a more general definition CONCISEness goes out the window. --- Peter Richardson, ACSnet: peter@trlsasy.trl.oz Telecom Research Laboratories, UUCP: {uunet,mcvax}!trlsasy.trl.oz!peter PO. Box 249, Clayton, Vic. 3168, Phone: (03) 541-6342 Australia. Fax: (03) 544-2362 D