robin@csuchico.uucp (Robin Goldstone) (04/02/89)
I have already posted several articles to this group regarding RSTS in its current state (well, I'm at 9.5 which is almost current...). I have seen no replies to my messages. All I have seen is some nostalgia about 'the old days' of RSTS. OK, everyone lets get the reminiscing over with and start some discussion about presentday concerns. RSTS is alive and still being used on a daytoday basis by some people. If any of those people are reading this and share in my interest to discuss RSTS 9.x, please give me some signs of life! Otherwise, I will go away and those of you who used RSTS 'once upon a time' and consider it an amusing piece of historical trivia can take over!!! Robin Goldstone, Systems Software Specialist California State University, Chico Computer Center robin@csuchico.edu
beadel@penelope.oswego.edu (Edward F. Beadel Jr.) (04/06/89)
In article <1989Apr1.193035.18527@csuchico.uucp> robin@csuchico.uucp (Robin Goldstone) writes: >I have already posted several articles to this group regarding RSTS in its >current state (well, I'm at 9.5 which is almost current...). I have seen no >replies to my messages. All I have seen is some nostalgia about 'the I was sure that I posted a reply to the group. We still have a RSTS/E system (V9.6-11) with DECNet (V4.1) on a PDP-11/70. I am a member of the DECUS (Digital Equipment Computer Users Group) RSTS SIG (Special Interest Group) Steering Committee, and represent that group on the DECUS Communications Committee. I will try to forward your questions/concerns to the Steering Committee and/or the RSTS Software Engineering Group. -ed Edward F. Beadel, Jr., Assistant Director Instructional Computing Center SUNY College at Oswego beadel@oswego.Oswego.EDU Oswego, NY 13126 (315)-341-3055