[comp.society.women] Technical Core, Take Two

skyler@violet.berkeley.edu (07/30/88)

For reasons which are obscure to me, I'm slightly frustrated
that my point about the technical core was so badly expressed.
I'm going to try to explain it a little better.

The classic scheme of organization (basically taken from Weber)
is the pyramid.  In America, this has also been combined with
the idea of "the science of management"--that is, that there are
people who are trained in management and can manage anything,
including firms which produce things they wouldn't even recognize
on a silver platter.

This kind of management has a variety of problems.  And, among
them is that those people who make technical decisions are completely
isolated from thos people who make administrative, legal, or marketing
decisions.  It has been suggested that women don't like to be in the
technical core, because women like to mediate and women like to have
more contact with the general public than being in the technical
core allows.

Supposedly, computer firms had a different organization, more akin
to the way that academic departments are arranged.  In many academic
departments, the chair of the department is a professor who still
teaches classes and will, at some time, return to teaching full time.

That is, members of the technical core would manage groups while
continuing to do technical research.  They might "move up" the ladder
of the organization, but would continue to do some technical research
all the while.  They would, in any case, sometimes return to doing
research full time.

This could be better for women in that one could be
involved with mediation and technical research at the same time.

So, I have a series of questions.   The first is, does this kind of
organization still exist?  If so, is it better for women?

-Trish

paw3c@galen.acc.virginia.edu (Pat Wilson) (07/31/88)

>             It has been suggested that women don't like to be in the
> technical core, because women like to mediate and women like to have
> more contact with the general public than being in the technical
> core allows.

I have trouble with this, because, in _my_ case, at least, it's
just not true.  I would _dearly_ love to be in a "technical core"
where I could just work on something, rather than having to deal
with other people (I'm a system administrator, and so am
responsible to about 300 users).  I think that IF there's a
reason women _don't_ like to be in the technical core, it might
be because those who are _already_ there (kind of by default,
men, right?) don't _want_ women there, and make them feel
unwanted in subtle ways.


Pat Wilson
paw3c@acc.virginia.edu || uunet!virginia!paw3c || paw3c@virginia.BITNET