[gnu.emacs] comp.emacs vs. gnu.emacs

kim@kannel.lut.fi (Kimmo Suominen) (06/29/89)

In article <8906282347.AA00345@garnet.berkeley.edu> rusty@GARNET.BERKELEY.EDU
writes:

   Path: kannel!tut!draken!kth!mcvax!uunet!dino!uxc.cso.uiuc.edu!iuvax!cica!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!GARNET.BERKELEY.EDU!rusty
   From: rusty@GARNET.BERKELEY.EDU
   Newsgroups: comp.emacs
   Date: 28 Jun 89 23:47:05 GMT
   Lines: 6

   Why are there these two newsgroups?  I notice that about 75% of the
   articles that are posted to comp.emacs are about gnu emacs, and about
   99% of those are also posted to gnu.emacs.

   I think that I shall propose to the usenet overlords that the
   gnu.emacs newsgroup be deleted.

I don't think that is a good idea, since some people don't want to read
articles about other than GNU Emacs.  Another point is that when you want to
find out something about GNU Emacs you would usually think of writing to
gnu.emacs rather than comp.emacs.  This way if you aren't interested in GNU
you wouldn't get that message.

Smart newsreaders notice from the Message-ID that you've already read a
message in another newsgroup.

This is a cross-posting, too ;-)

Kim

--
 ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
( Kimmo Suominen              Electronic Mail on Internet:  kim@kannel.lut.fi )
( "That's what I think!"                         on Funet:  KUULA::KIM        )
 '''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''