pardo@june.cs.washington.edu (David Keppel) (10/25/88)
There's been discussion recently in gnu.gcc.bug about (lack of) optimizations on "for" loops. In general, these don't seem like bugs to me, so I'm not sure where to post messages of the form "gee, I notice that gcc doesn't do <apparantly good thing>. Having lookend in PROJECTS and determined that <apparantly good thing> isn't in there, where to send mail? (latest idea: in f(){ static int i; for (i=0;i<N;++i); }, i should be loaded into a register unless -traditional is specified.). ;-D on ( Pseudo-optimal code ) Pardo -- pardo@cs.washington.edu {rutgers,cornell,ucsd,ubc-cs,tektronix}!uw-beaver!june!pardo