w8sdz@WSMR-SIMTEL20.ARMY.MIL (Keith Petersen) (02/17/89)
[--forwarded message--] From: "Leslie C. Brown" <lbrown@BRL.MIL> Re: pkzip I've uploaded PKWare's new ZIP archiver PKZ090.EXE to Simtel20. I did a couple of comparison tests on the same file YAMDEMO.EXE. PKPAK used squashing with a 30% reduction PKZIP with default was also 30% reduction. PKZIP with factor 3 gave 40% reduction PKZIP with factor 4 gave 41% reduction. I didn't do any timing but it is does slow down with the higher compression factors. --- [--forwarded message--] From: Alan Ariel <1052P%NAVPGS.BITNET@CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU> Re: PKZ090.EXE Here's a copy of a message I uploaded to some of the local BBS on a comparison: I just thought I might enlighten a few people with some stats on PKZIP. There's a large software package on my hard disk. I don't use it all of the time, so I keep it ARC'ed up and UNARC it when I need it. Here is a comparison of PKPAK and PKZIP using the extra compression feature: Uncompressed: 1,088,419 bytes PKPAK: 765,177 bytes (29.7% Compression) PKZIP: 636,923 bytes (41.5% Compression) (used with -ea4 and -eb4 parameters) It ran a lot slower, but space is more critical than time. And, if PKZIP is run without extra compression, it's execution time is comparable to PKPAK. This one was worth waiting for ! -Alan --- Thanks, Les and Alan. PKZ090.EXE is now in the PD1:<MSDOS.ZIP> directory. --Keith