[comp.binaries.ibm.pc.d] ZOO/ARC

ejd@caen.engin.umich.edu (Edward J Driscoll) (02/24/89)

Didn't we just go through this six months ago?  I'm not going
to vote one way or the other here.  What I am going to do is
suggest that whoever wants to know/decide should collect votes
*via e-mail*.  The issue could be decided like newsgroup
formation or something (I think the rules there is 100 more
yes votes than no votes, but don't quote me).

All the arguments came out with the PK/SEA business last
summer.  I think we've all heard them and managed to form
an opinion.  I'd like to avoid another couple thousand posts
of those same arguments.

How 'bout it?  I am NOT volunterring to collect votes.  Perhaps
the original poster would be willing to do so.
-- 
Ed Driscoll
ejd@caen.engin.umich.edu

dhesi@bsu-cs.UUCP (Rahul Dhesi) (02/25/89)

In article <41aaa31c.11a9f@uhura.engin.umich.edu> ejd@caen.engin.umich.edu
(Edward J Driscoll) writes:
     What I am going to do is suggest that whoever wants to know/decide
     should collect votes *via e-mail*.

I think it was Brian O'Neill who took an email vote last year.  (I had
thought it was unwise to use zoo at that time even though the vote was
in its favor).  Perhaps he might want to do it again, or perhaps Roy
Bixler, who posted the original article, could do it.  Best not post
any votes.
-- 
Rahul Dhesi         UUCP:  <backbones>!{iuvax,pur-ee}!bsu-cs!dhesi
                    ARPA:  bsu-cs!dhesi@iuvax.cs.indiana.edu