[comp.binaries.ibm.pc.d] Headers

jbrown@jato.Jpl.Nasa.Gov (Jordan Brown) (04/06/89)

I do have one comment on the CBIP headers - the Subject: line should stay
the same for all files in a group so that kill files and subject-thread
code work.  (I know that I can edit my kill file and make it work, but
it'd be much nicer if K would just do what it's supposed to do.)
Putting the part info in the Summary line or some other aux header
would be fine, though it wouldn't show in lists-of-articles.

dhesi@bsu-cs.bsu.edu (Rahul Dhesi) (04/07/89)

In article <1056@jato.Jpl.Nasa.Gov> jbrown@jato.UUCP (Jordan Brown) writes:
>I do have one comment on the CBIP headers - the Subject: line should stay
>the same for all files in a group so that kill files and subject-thread
>code work.

There was discussion in some other newsgroups about how subject lines
differing slightly were difficult to kill.  One good suggestion that
came out of that discussion was to modify news readers to treat
material in parentheses as a comment, and have only that part change.
Precisely for this reason, I always put the "part xx/xx" part in
parens.  So that if somebody, somewhere, has modified his news reader
to treat that as a comment, killing the subject will work.

Perhaps one day this convention will be standard.  For now, you will
have to hack your news reading program.
-- 
Rahul Dhesi         UUCP:  <backbones>!{iuvax,pur-ee}!bsu-cs!dhesi
                    ARPA:  dhesi@bsu-cs.bsu.edu

kleonard@gvlv2.GVL.Unisys.COM (Ken Leonard) (04/07/89)

>I do have one comment on the CBIP headers - the Subject: line should stay 
>the same for all files in a group so that kill files and subject-thread 
>code work. ... 
AMEN AMEN AMEN!!! 
 
Regardz, 
Ken Leonard 
Duke of West Nantmeal; Hereditary Captain-in-Chief and Master of Gunnery, 
His Majesty's Loyal Company of Freebooters Cannoners and Military Enginers. 
--- 
I'm too old to know better.