swh@hpsmtc1.HP.COM (Steve Harrold) (04/18/89)
Re: Bad CRC in INTERC.ARC posting The recent INTERC.ARC file posted in c.b.i.p is not de-archible. PKXARC complains that the file fails a CRC check. The two parts all passed the "brik -cv" test. (Yes, I did use a binary protocol to download to my PC).
sms@ficc.uu.net (Stanley M. Sutton) (04/19/89)
In article <17560009@hpsmtc1.HP.COM>, swh@hpsmtc1.HP.COM (Steve Harrold) writes: > Re: Bad CRC in INTERC.ARC posting > The recent INTERC.ARC file posted in c.b.i.p is not de-archible. PKXARC > complains that the file fails a CRC check. > The two parts all passed the "brik -cv" test. > (Yes, I did use a binary protocol to download to my PC). I downloaded the INTERC.ARC file and de-arced it using PKXARC with no problems. -- Stanley M. Sutton, Service & Test, Ferranti International Controls Corp. Work: uunet.uu.net!ficc!sms, sms@ficc.uu.net, +1 713 274 5023 Home: bigtex!texbell!sugar!sms, sms@sugar.hackercorp.com Opinions may not represent the policies of FICC or Service and Test.
swh@hpsmtc1.HP.COM (Steve Harrold) (04/19/89)
Re: Bad CRC I am red-faced. Upon re-entering the notesgroup, and re-acquiring the files, and reconstructing the ARC file, wouldn't you know it, it worked fine. There is really nothing wrong with it, just my fingers.