taine@bibs.FIDONET.ORG (Taine Gilliam) (07/05/89)
i just recieved vpic14. it seems to be a bit behind. bob montgomery(the author) is currently up to 1.8. 1.4 had several bugs in it and is missing a few of the nocer translations too. taine --- msged 1.99L MSC * Origin: The B.I.B.S. System (803)556-9094 /HST. (1:372/42) -- Taine Gilliam - at FidoNet node 1:372/42 w/ Magpie BBS UUCP: uunet!bibs!taine INTERNET: taine@bibs.FIDONET.ORG
hst@mh_co2.mh.nl (Klaas Hemstra) (07/11/89)
We did not receive part 02 of the vpic posting.
Could someone please e-mail it to me ?
(Or is it missing at more sites ?)
Thanks, Klaas Hemstra
Klaas Hemstra (hst@mh.nl) | / / ,~~~ ~~/~~
uucp: ..{uunet!}hp4nl!mh.nl!hst | /--/ `-, / ___ |_/ |__|
Multihouse N.V., Gouda, the Netherlands | / / ___/ / --- | \ | |
"Most of us mindreaders are atheist, you know" A song for Lya: George Martinpt@beta.lanl.gov (Paul A. Thiessen) (07/11/89)
In article <3362@mhres.mh.nl> hst@mh_co2.mh.nl (Klaas Hemstra) writes: >We did not receive part 02 of the vpic posting. > >Could someone please e-mail it to me ? > >(Or is it missing at more sites ?) It is missing here, too. I think a repost is in order. - Paul -- ------------------------------------------------------------ PAUL THIESSEN (Summer only: pt@lanl.gov) pthiessen@hmcvax.bitnet ...uunet!jarthur!pthiesse ------------------------------------------------------------
simon@barnum.dec.com (Curiosier and Curiosier...) (07/13/89)
In article <27934@beta.lanl.gov>, pt@beta.lanl.gov (Paul A. Thiessen) writes... >In article <3362@mhres.mh.nl> hst@mh_co2.mh.nl (Klaas Hemstra) writes: >>We did not receive part 02 of the vpic posting. > >It is missing here, too. I think a repost is in order. It really looks like it didn't make to many sites. Is a repost too much of a problem? Thanks. --- Leo Simon simon@hpstek.dec.com --or-- ...!decwrl!hpstek.dec.com!simon --or-- simon%hpstek.dec@decwrl.dec.com
haeb@ibmpcug.UUCP (Harry Broomhall) (07/13/89)
In article <27934@beta.lanl.gov> pt@beta.UUCP (Paul A. Thiessen) writes: >In article <3362@mhres.mh.nl> hst@mh_co2.mh.nl (Klaas Hemstra) writes: >>We did not receive part 02 of the vpic posting. >> >>Could someone please e-mail it to me ? >> >>(Or is it missing at more sites ?) It is also missing at this site, and is part of quite a number of missing postings on c.b.i.p. Also missing are:- 082 (GAWK docs part 6), 098 (unknown), and 099 (unknown). If there was anything after 104 we also did not receive them. Also the original post of 071 failed. Was there an index for Vol 3? If so that also has failed to appear. Up to now we have had a reliable stream of postings, this is the first large gap I have noticed. Regards, Harry Broomhall -- Automatic Disclaimer: The views expressed above are those of the author alone and may not represent the views of the IBM PC User Group.
Howard_Reed_Johnson@cup.portal.com (07/13/89)
I don't think very many people got part 2 of the vpic14 posting. A repost would be in order, but if someone goes to the trouble of doing that, why don't they post the latest version? Vpic16 is available on CompuServe.
spcecdt@ucscb.UCSC.EDU (Space Cadet) (07/13/89)
Perhaps someone could get hold of the latest version of vpic (1.8) from CompuDisservice and post that, instead of a repost of 1.4. I tried but they do not seem to support kermit transfers anymore (not that I ever got it to work when they did...) John DuBois
jfm@cs.odu.edu (John F. Mclaurin) (07/13/89)
If anyone did get this would they post also.