[comp.binaries.ibm.pc.d] RLL controler with MFM drives

mitsolid@acf5.NYU.EDU (Thanasis Mitsolides) (12/02/89)

Hi,
	A friend of mine has a 72mb MFM drive (ATASI 3085) and
he would like to try and format it using an RLL controler.

	If he succeeds great.
	If he fails, what? 
	Is there any chance he might damage the drive during the testing?
	Would the drive still work with an MFM controler for sure?

Thanks,

Thanasis


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Has it ever occured to you that God may be a committee?"   R. A. Heinlein

Internet: mitsolid@csd2.nyu.edu	         (mitsolid%csd2.nyu.edu@relay.cs.net)
UUCP    : ...!uunet!cmcl2!csd2!mitsolid
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

kaleb@mars.jpl.nasa.gov (Kaleb Keithley) (12/06/89)

In article <11470001@acf5.NYU.EDU> mitsolid@acf5.NYU.EDU (Thanasis Mitsolides) writes:
>Hi,
>	A friend of mine has a 72mb MFM drive (ATASI 3085) and
>he would like to try and format it using an RLL controler.
>
>	If he succeeds great.
>	If he fails, what? 
>	Is there any chance he might damage the drive during the testing?
>	Would the drive still work with an MFM controler for sure?
>
at this risk of starting a flame fest, the answers, in order are:
       probably will succeed.
       probably won't fail.
       No chance of damaging the drive.
       It will still work with MFM controller.

I have successfully RLLed both Seagate and Micropolis MFM drives.  Make sure
you run the RLL controllers surface scan, and add found defects to the bad
track list.



Chewey, get us outta here!
                 
kaleb@mars.jpl.nasa.gov             (818)354-8771
Kaleb Keithley

cmaidt@metnet.FIDONET.ORG (Chris Maidt) (12/10/89)

In an article of <5 Dec 89 17:04:21 GMT>, kaleb@mars.jpl.nasa.gov (Kaleb  
Keithley) writes:

 |In article <11470001@acf5.NYU.EDU> mitsolid@acf5.NYU.EDU (Thanasis 
 |Mitsolides) writes:
 |>Hi,
 |>       A friend of mine has a 72mb MFM drive (ATASI 3085) and
 |>he would like to try and format it using an RLL controler.
 |
 | ...
 | 
 |I have successfully RLLed both Seagate and Micropolis MFM drives.  Make 
 |sure you run the RLL controllers surface scan, and add found defects to    
 |the bad track list.

Seagate recently closed the window on RLLing it's MFM drives.  I have a 2 year   
old ST-225, and it RLLed fine.  I have a 1 year old ST-251-1, and it will not   
RLL, preiod.

I now have a new ST-4144R, (RLLable ST-4096) ... it RLLed to 122 megs just   
fine.  Beware that disk manager will not format these large drives, no matter   
what it claims.  The new address (and this works for AT's too!) is g=cc00:5   
... I have an AT classer with a WD1007v-SR2 1:1 interleave controller, and   
after I tossed DM Iit took me all of 30 minutes to RLL, partition, and format   
all 150-odd megabytes.  The 4144 is first, the 225 is second.

I finally have room for a sizeable (read grreater than 30 megs) XENIX   
partition!

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.   cmaidt%metnet@uokmax.uucp                     . .
.   postmaster@metnet.fidonet.org                 .  .
.   ...!apple!uokmax!metnet!cmaidt                .  .
.   postmaster%metnet@uokmax.ecn.uoknor.edu       .  .
.   cmaidt%f9.n147.z1.fidonet.org@uokmax.uucp     .  .
.   FidoNets 1:147/9.0, 1:147/10.0, 1:147/30.0    .  .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  .
 .   The Wayback Machine - N/8/1 - (405)848-2005   . .
   . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 


--  
Chris Maidt - via FidoNet node 1:147/10
UUCP: ...apple.com!uokmax!metnet!cmaidt
INTERNET: cmaidt@metnet.FIDONET.ORG