davidsen@sixhub.UUCP (Wm E. Davidsen Jr) (02/25/90)
I would like some quick feedback on what people want for colume id on
postings; one id per item, used on all parts, or one id per part.
The posting software I got from Rahul *seems* to do one id per file,
regardless of parts, but since it didn't do anything until I beat on it
for a bit, I might have broken it myself.
Since I have invested the time this afternoon to get it working with
one per part, I can go either way. I will wait a day or so for input,
since I don't have any small stuff waiting and don't want to change
twice.
--
bill davidsen - davidsen@sixhub.uucp (uunet!crdgw1!sixhub!davidsen)
sysop *IX BBS and Public Access UNIX
moderator of comp.binaries.ibm.pc
"Getting old is bad, but it beats the hell out of the alternative" -anonfrotz@drivax.UUCP (Frotz) (02/27/90)
davidsen@sixhub.UUCP (Wm E. Davidsen Jr) writes:
] Since I have invested the time this afternoon to get it working with
] one per part, I can go either way. I will wait a day or so for input,
] since I don't have any small stuff waiting and don't want to change
] twice.
I would expect that archive sites would appreciate one ID per group
with each part containing a (xx/yy) or (Part xx/yy) in the subject. I
don't archive them, so I have not vested interest either way.
--Frotz @Digital Research, Incorporated amdahl!drivax!frotz
70 Garden Court, B15 (408) 649-3896
Monterey, California 93940 Ask for John Fa'atuai