dvadura@watdragon.waterloo.edu (Dennis Vadura) (10/09/90)
Has anyone managed to get com-and (yet another comm program, with which I was trully impressed until this happened :-), to run in conjunction with ANSI.SYS or NANSI.SYS. It doesn't directly support a full set of vt100 escape codes, and it claims that if you use one of these (actually FANSI.SYS which I can't get right off to test it), that you have full vt100 emulation. All I get it is really weird behaviour with com-and and the screen/keyboard if I have any ANSI.SYS drivers installed, nothing else has any troubles though. -thanks -dennis -- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- "This is almost worth the HIGH blood pressure!" he |Dennis Vadura thought as yet another mosquito exploded.-R.Patching|dvadura@dragon.uwaterloo.ca ================================================================================
charles@convex.com (Dave Charles) (10/10/90)
In <1990Oct9.135350.14148@watdragon.waterloo.edu> dvadura@watdragon.waterloo.edu (Dennis Vadura) writes: >Has anyone managed to get com-and (yet another comm program, with which I >was trully impressed until this happened :-), to run in conjunction with >ANSI.SYS or NANSI.SYS. It doesn't directly support a full set of vt100 >escape codes, and it claims that if you use one of these (actually FANSI.SYS >which I can't get right off to test it), that you have full vt100 emulation. >All I get it is really weird behaviour with com-and and the screen/keyboard >if I have any ANSI.SYS drivers installed, nothing else has any troubles >though. I get wierd responses when trying to emulate a VT100 using version 2.6 (from C'serve) also. I have a clone w/ NANSI.SYS installed communicating with a UNIX BSD system. Most problems seem to occur when I try "vi" on the UNIX box. The PC seems to loose its mind re. screen management. Has anyone else seem this behavior? Or, any suggestions?