yogi@cs.ubc.ca (Joseph Gil) (04/23/91)
The title says it all. If we want to save time,space and not sacrifice compatability on other machines, we should turn to the LZH format (as soon as the C sources are out). I hate the oooooo..... output, but, I hate more to wait for dld.
c60b-1eq@web-1c.berkeley.edu (Noam Mendelson) (04/23/91)
In article <1991Apr22.220214.19570@cs.ubc.ca> yogi@cs.ubc.ca (Joseph Gil) writes: >The title says it all. If we want to save time,space and not >sacrifice compatability on other machines, we should turn to >the LZH format (as soon as the C sources are out). I hate >the oooooo..... output, but, I hate more to wait for dld. If you're talking about LHARC, the C sources have been out for a long time. If you're talking about LHa, you won't be seeing many C sources out since it is partly written in 8086 assembly language, making a UNIX port extremely difficult. -- +==========================================================================+ | Noam Mendelson ..!ucbvax!web!c60b-1eq | "I haven't lost my mind, | | c60b-1eq@web.Berkeley.EDU | it's backed up on tape | | University of California at Berkeley | somewhere." |