David Barr <DSB100@psuvm.psu.edu> (06/30/91)
In article <1991Jun28.224447.1228@pinhead.pegasus.com>, todd@pinhead.pegasus.com (Todd Ogasawara) says: >Has there ever been any discussion about creating a >comp.binaries.ibm.pc.windows news group? [.....] is that with three >So, how do you feel about creating > comp.binaries.ibm.pc.windows >and/or > comp.binaries.ibm.pc.windows.vbasic I love the idea. but I'd much rather stick to a shorter name. I propose: comp.binaries.mswindows I'd say let the vbasic stuff go in mswindows for now, and if it really takes off (i'm not much of a fan for it myself), then newgroup it as well, something like comp.binaries.mswindows.vbasic. (which conveniently allows for other hierarchies). --- David Barr - Penn State CAC Student Consultant, Student Programmer DSB100@psuvm.psu.edu | dsbarr@vivaldi.psu.edu dsbarr@psusun03.psu.edu | ...psuvax1!hogbbs!barrstl!barr
kramer@WITTENBERG.EDU ("Mike Andrews") (07/01/91)
Uh, what about comp.windows.ms and comp.windows.ms.programmer that
have been in existance for quite some time now?? Or were you talking
about a group with a different purpose that I didn't quite catch...
(Flame via Email)
Mike
---
Mike Andrews Springfield, OH | A (by)product of the heart of the Bluegrass
Internet: kramer@wittenberg.edu | Rush: "Tough times demand tough talk demand
""(home): mdandr00@ukpr.uky.edu | tough hearts demand tough songs demand...."