david@actsn.fay.ar.us (David Summers) (08/31/90)
I'm not sure if this has already been discussed before but I just found out that SMAIL 3.1.19 works slightly different from SENDMAIL 5.61 in the way that it handles transport-level addresses. SENDMAIL will accept addresses with commas in them in the command line, while SMAIL 3.1.19 will not. This caused my SMAIL mailer to fail on the first of a multiple-address mail message, until I re-configured and re-compiled MUSH with the NO_COMMAS macro defined. Just thought I'd let people know in case someone was having problems with this. Sorry to waste bandwidth if this has already been discussed before. ELM 2.3 PL6 seems to already work correctly, so I didn't have to re-compile it. Other than that, I've had NO problems with SMAIL! I'm impressed! - David Summers -- I'm sick and tired of this machine, I wish that I could sell it. It never does just what I want, but only what I tell it! - David Summers (david@actsn.fay.ar.us)