maples@ddtg.com (Greg Maples) (05/07/91)
While I'm busy submitting news today, does anyone have a clue as to why my sending mail as mail user@machine (inside our domain) would be replacing To:user with Apparently To: ? I know I've seen this issue addressed before, but it was some time ago and I can't find the back article. Thanks -- Greg Maples | These are my opinions, not yours. Keep your Systems Group Leader | hands off 'em. They're also not the opinions DuPont Design Technologies | of my employer or yours. So there. (c) 1991 maples%ddtisvr@uunet.uu.net | The preceding is an opinion which is mine.
rickert@mp.cs.niu.edu (Neil Rickert) (05/07/91)
In article <1991May6.210024.4775@ddtg.com> maples@ddtg.com (Greg Maples) writes: >While I'm busy submitting news today, does anyone have a >clue as to why my sending mail as mail user@machine (inside >our domain) would be replacing To:user with Apparently To: ? When you use '/usr/ucb/mail user@machine', the 'mail command', namely /usr/ucb/mail creates a message header with 'To:' and possible 'Subject:' and 'Cc:' etc. However if you use '/bin/mail user@machine' you are using a much simpler mail program which just takes the message as-is, and does not add any headers. When mailing news this is often appropriate, since the message already has headers, and you don't want an extraneous extra set. When mailing news, this way, however, although there are already headers, there is no 'To:' header (not appropriate for news). When 'sendmail' sees the message it notices the absence of a recipient header, so creates one. It uses 'Apparently-To:' to distinguish it from a 'To:' created by the original author of the message. If you don't like it, don't feed messages directly to /bin/mail, but instead pipe them first through a sed script which discards unneeded headers and adds a 'To:'. -- =*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*= Neil W. Rickert, Computer Science <rickert@cs.niu.edu> Northern Illinois Univ. DeKalb, IL 60115 +1-815-753-6940