chris@mimsy.UUCP (Chris Torek) (10/15/88)
In article <8649@smoke.ARPA> gwyn@smoke.ARPA (Doug Gwyn) writes: ><strings.h> doesn't declare strtok, so it is assumed to return int >which is not compatible with the char * being assigned into. ><strings.h> was invented by Berkeley without regard for existing >practice. `Existing practise' being, at the time, either PWB or SysIII, neither of which could be considered somehow more valid than BSD. I know not who was truly first, but one could just as easily say `<string.h> was invented by AT&T USG without regard for existing practise.' (Actually, the places to look are V7 and 32/V.) ><string.h> is the official standard header for the str* functions, >and it does declare strtok. ... and in the future, expect the 4BSD <strings.h> to simply be a link to <string.h>. In the meantime, just use the latter; it does exist in 4.3BSD and is *now* clearly the best choice. -- In-Real-Life: Chris Torek, Univ of MD Comp Sci Dept (+1 301 454 7163) Domain: chris@mimsy.umd.edu Path: uunet!mimsy!chris