nevin1@ihlpb.ATT.COM (Liber) (04/29/89)
In article <10143@smoke.BRL.MIL> gwyn@brl.arpa (Doug Gwyn) writes: >I disagree >with some of the Rationale (namely the part that implies that we expect >people to actually code using trigraphs), but basically it's on the mark. Some things could have been worded better. Is it really unfortunate that the ASCII repertoire is not a subset of all other commonly used character sets? Without it, we might still be stuck with EBCDIC! It's been a looong week, -- _ __ NEVIN ":-)" LIBER nevin1@ihlpb.ATT.COM (312) 979-4751 IH 4F-410 ' ) ) "I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, / / _ , __o ____ briefed, debriefed or numbered! My life is my own!" / (_</_\/ <__/ / <_ As far as I know, these are NOT the opinions of AT&T.