diamond@csl.sony.co.jp (Norman Diamond) (09/08/89)
In article <1989Sep6.052228.17374@algor2.algorists.com> jeffrey@algor2.UUCP (Jeffrey Kegler) writes: >Question: Is an implementation whose null pointer is the same as the >result of some integer-to-pointer cast conforming? Apparently not, >since 3.2.2.3 states, "... a null pointer is guaranteed to compare >unequal to a pointer to any object or function." This looks like a bit of a problem all right. Can it still be fixed by editorial change? For example, "... any legally created object or function" or "... any C object or function." -- -- Norman Diamond, Sony Corporation (diamond@ws.sony.junet) The above opinions are inherited by your machine's init process (pid 1), after being disowned and orphaned. However, if you see this at Waterloo or Anterior, then their administrators must have approved of these opinions.