bhoughto@hopi.intel.com (Blair P. Houghton) (03/19/91)
Anyone see more verbose evidence that a blank type-specifier indicates type-specifier `int' than the two instances of, "or no type specifiers," at (ANSI X3.159-1989, sec. 3.5.2, p. 60, ll. 11 and 26)? --Blair "If the signature contains a blank quotation or no quotation, then the reader will behave exactly as if the signer had made an uproarious witticism."
diamond@jit345.swstokyo.dec.com (Norman Diamond) (03/22/91)
In article <3119@inews.intel.com> bhoughto@hopi.intel.com (Blair P. Houghton) writes: >Anyone see more verbose evidence that a blank >type-specifier indicates type-specifier `int' than the two >instances of, "or no type specifiers," at (ANSI X3.159-1989, >sec. 3.5.2, p. 60, ll. 11 and 26)? I don't. But I think that line 11 (along with the text at the beginning of the section) is sufficiently verbose for this purpose. -- Norman Diamond diamond@tkov50.enet.dec.com If this were the company's opinion, I wouldn't be allowed to post it.