charlesd@tekig4.UUCP (Charles Davis) (10/02/86)
It is apparent that the psychologist, who was offended by the "Male Sexuality Research" request for participants, has not referred to net.research, where all of the academic qualifications and formal sponsorship are listed.
gnome@oliveb.UUCP (Gary) (10/02/86)
> > As a psychologist, I was particularly offended and suspicious of the above > request in a net.general posting. If legitimate research is being done, > especially in a somewhat sensitive area, the researcher gives his academic > qualifications and the formal sponsorship of his study. The posting in > net.general, therefore, roused doubt in my mind about whether or not it was > really research or whether it was some other less savory activity. What unsavory things were you thinking of? The survey can't be used to build a mailing list (no names/addresses). The only thing I could see is that it could "ruin the good name of USENET". I'd find that hard to believe... Gary
gadfly@ihlpa.UUCP (Gadfly) (10/06/86)
-- > It is apparent that the psychologist, who was offended by the "Male Sexuality > Research" request for participants, has not referred to net.research, where > all of the academic qualifications and formal sponsorship are listed. It is apparent that the netnik, who admonished the psychologist, who was offended by the "Male Sexuality Research" request for participants, who lived in the house that Jack built, does not know the difference between restrictive and non-restrictive clauses. *** *** JE MAINTIENDRAI ***** ***** ****** ****** 06 Oct 86 [15 Vendemiaire An CXCV] ken perlow ***** ***** (312)979-8042 ** ** ** ** ihnp4!ihlpa!gadfly *** *** <== NOTE NEW ADDRESS!