[comp.unix.aux] AUX and hard drives

sorensen@athena.mit.edu (Alma G. Sorensen) (06/18/91)

March 1991 MacWorld had a nice review of 110-250 MB hard drives.
On the basis of their comments, I think I can narrow my choice
for a 210 or so drive to : La Cie, APS, ClubMac, Hard Drives
International, and Microtech.

Anyone have experience with these under A/UX? Horror stories?
And of course, actual benchmarks?

Sorry to bring this up yet again, but the net is just such a good
resource...

Thanks,

Greg Sorensen
sorensen@athena.mit.edu

hintz@oz.ucop.edu (Richard Hintz) (06/19/91)

In article <1991Jun18.155914.24331@athena.mit.edu> sorensen@athena.mit.edu
(Alma G. Sorensen) writes:
>March 1991 MacWorld had a nice review of 110-250 MB hard drives.
>On the basis of their comments, I think I can narrow my choice
>for a 210 or so drive to : La Cie, APS, ClubMac, Hard Drives
>International, and Microtech.


I have a follow on to this question.  I have a Quantum 210 which I got from
APS, but they don't supply magic A/UX formatters.  Also, I have a Conner 120 in
a IIsi which also doesn't have the magic disk utilities.

Would anyone point me to today's best utilities for converting these disks to
A/UX format?  Thanks.

Richard Hintz   opsrjh@uccvma.ucop.edu
University of California 

damour@pluto.ral.rpi.edu (Kevin Damour) (06/20/91)

In article <1991Jun18.155914.24331@athena.mit.edu> sorensen@athena.mit.edu (Alma G. Sorensen) writes:

   March 1991 MacWorld had a nice review of 110-250 MB hard drives.
   On the basis of their comments, I think I can narrow my choice
   for a 210 or so drive to : La Cie, APS, ClubMac, Hard Drives
   International, and Microtech.

   Anyone have experience with these under A/UX? Horror stories?
   And of course, actual benchmarks?

   Sorry to bring this up yet again, but the net is just such a good
   resource...

   Thanks,


I am using two models from LaCie, both are from Quantum.  After a few
revs in the software for formatting (we got this settled over 1 year
ago) and a ROM upgrade on the Quantum drive, I have had NO problems
with the drives running under AUX.  I just sent in my old
driver software to get an updated version for running under Sys 7 -
wonder what new tools they added.
      Kevin Damour
      CIRSSE Robotic Labs
      RPI, Troy NY
      damour@ral.rpi.edu

P.S. I have no connections to LaCie except for their drives running on
my MAC.

sorensen@athena.mit.edu (Alma G. Sorensen) (06/20/91)

Thanks to all who responded.

One of my respondents warned me strongly away from Maxtor drives,
recounting some bad experiences.

Is this universal experience? APS has a great deal on the Maxtor 340 MB
(only $1189 external), that I am tempted...


Thanks,

Greg Sorensen
sorensen@athena.mit.edu

jtn@potomac.ads.com (John T. Nelson) (06/20/91)

In article <1991Jun20.120430.13058@athena.mit.edu> sorensen@athena.mit.edu (Alma G. Sorensen) writes:
>Thanks to all who responded.
>
>One of my respondents warned me strongly away from Maxtor drives,
>recounting some bad experiences.
>
>Is this universal experience? APS has a great deal on the Maxtor 340 MB
>(only $1189 external), that I am tempted...


The sour grapes concerning Maxtor amazes me.  In the past I've heard
nothing but good things about Maxtor.  NeXT Computers used them
exclusively (at least when the machine was introduced).  Has something
changed over at Maxtor?  Corner-cutting?



=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
ORGANIZATION:  BLETCH (Bletcherous League of Evil Twisted Computer Hackers)
UUCP:          kzin!speaker@mimsy.umd.edu  INTERNET:   jtn@potomac.ads.com
SPOKEN:        Dark Hacker                 PHONE:      (703) 243-1611
FAVORITE MAGAZINE:   Midnight Engineer
TWISTED DIABOLICAL LAUGH:	Mwahh ah ha ha hah ha ha ha!

The Mythos of Dark Hacker:

"Controlled by the sinister and shadowy "suits" Dark Hacker now employs
the tools of computer science to free himself from the suit's will.
By day he is a lackey... but at night when the city sleeps he
becomes.... DARK HACKER!"
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

marcelo@deadzone.uucp (Marcelo Gallardo) (06/21/91)

sorensen@athena.mit.edu (Alma G. Sorensen) writes:

>Thanks to all who responded.

>One of my respondents warned me strongly away from Maxtor drives,
>recounting some bad experiences.

>Is this universal experience? APS has a great deal on the Maxtor 340 MB
>(only $1189 external), that I am tempted...


	I've been using a Maxtor LT-100 as my root partition for about a
	year now. It's been working better than the Quantum 120 which
	houses my /usr partition. Well They've both been up and running
	without loosing any info, the Quantum just generates "Disk write
	c0d0s2 retry #1 successful." every once in a while. Never was
	able to figure out how to stop that.

	On a slightly different note, how many people use SyQuest
	cartridges with A/UX. I've been using mine for a while now and
	have noticed a few problems. First, it doesn't like having "big"
	programs compiled on it. Tried compiling "rn" on it once, and I
	received a "PANIC: while freeing inode" crash. Happened on a few
	other programs of that size as well.

	It also seems to constantly have read problems like the
	following...

	Disk read c4d0s3 Error: Recovered error, code = 0x17
	Logical block 34064, physical blocks 34160-34167
	Disk read c4d0s3 Error: Recovered error, code = 0x17
	Logical block 34224, physical blocks 34320-34327
	Disk read c4d0s3 Error: Recovered error, code = 0x17
	Logical block 34752, physical blocks 34848-34855
	Disk read c4d0s3 Error: Recovered error, code = 0x17
	Logical block 35248, physical blocks 35344-35351

	After a while (a few months) of use, I loose directories and
	files. Luckily I make backups, and I just re-format the
	cartridge and re-make the file system. I did have one cartridge
	go so bad, that it couldn't be formatted. Of course I used that
	cart for more than a year though.

	Anyone else have similar problems, or does everyone do the
	normal thing and just use SyQuests for Mac apps and backups?

	Sorry for the long winded posting 8-).

-- 
Marcelo Gallardo			marcelo%deadzone@princeton.edu
Test and Evaluation Specialist		...!princeton!deadzone!marcelo
Princeton University			marcelo@sparcwood.princeton.edu
Advanced Technologies and Applications		(609) 258-5661

alexis@panix.uucp (Alexis Rosen) (06/23/91)

I haven't had any problems with Maxtors, but the last one I bought was four
years ago, and I've never tried them with A/UX.

What I can tell you is that in that size, my favorite drive is the Wren Runner.
APS wants $1400. It's really worth it. I bought one when it was going for twice
the price, and I'm still glad I got it. It's extremely fast, and built like
a tank. (Details: transfer rate- 1.55MB/sec sustained; 11ms avg. access,
_without caching_.)

---
Alexis Rosen
Owner/Sysadmin, PANIX Public Access Unix, NY
alexis@panix.com
{cmcl2,apple}!panix!alexis

alexis@panix.uucp (Alexis Rosen) (06/23/91)

marcelo@deadzone.uucp (Marcelo Gallardo) writes:
>	On a slightly different note, how many people use SyQuest
>	cartridges with A/UX. I've been using mine for a while now and
>	have noticed a few problems. First, it doesn't like having "big"
>	programs compiled on it. Tried compiling "rn" on it once, and I
>	received a "PANIC: while freeing inode" crash. Happened on a few
>	other programs of that size as well.
>
>	It also seems to constantly have read problems like the
>	following...
>
>	Disk read c4d0s3 Error: Recovered error, code = 0x17
>	Logical block 34064, physical blocks 34160-34167
>	[etc.]

This doesn't surprise me at all. The Syquests have decent seek performance,
but their transfer speed is abominable. I think they're even worse than the
small 20MB Seagates that were so popular a year or two ago. And I'm not sure
about this, but I think that they rotate slower than regular disks. If so,
that doesn't help transfers, and increases latency (which makes seeking slower
than you'd expect from the avg. access numbers they quote).

What this all means is that the Syquests are barely acceptable to the A/UX
disk device driver. They're on the fuzzy lower boundary of the performance
envelope.

---
Alexis Rosen
Owner/Sysadmin, PANIX Public Access Unix, NY
alexis@panix.com
{cmcl2,apple}!panix!alexis