[alt.individualism] this is silly!

gypsy@c3pe.UUCP (the virtually invulnerable gypsyroach) (03/16/88)

look here peoples.  i am already about to unsubscribe to this newsgroup because
all i am seeing is argument over whether it's okay for someone to call themself
an individual and still subscribe to this newsgroup.  this is stupid.  why is
it so difficult to grasp the concept of individuals speaking to each other
about individuality?  or are we all unable to be individuals without attempting
to impose our own ideas on individuality on each other?

"Hey!  You can't be an individual THAT way!  that's all wrong!  here, do it
MY way!  hey, if you're gonna act like me how am i supposed to be an individual!
now i gotta go change myself again!"  

JEEZUS, peoples.  i will not tell any of you what my own concept of 
individuality is because someone will either tell me i'm wrong or
imitate me.  fuck you all.  i will just sit here in my chair and
laugh.  ha ha ha... do you hear that?  i'm laughing at you!  ha ha ha...

gypsy @ ..!decuac.dec.com!c3pe

"Does it now seem worth all the color of skies
 To see the earth through painted eyes?"
                                -- Nick Drake

ccs026@deneb.ucdavis.edu (-=paul=-) (03/19/88)

the virtually invulnerable gypsyroach writes:
>JEEZUS, peoples.  i will not tell any of you what my own concept of 
>individuality is because someone will either tell me i'm wrong or
>imitate me.  fuck you all.  i will just sit here in my chair and
>laugh.  ha ha ha... do you hear that?  i'm laughing at you!  ha ha ha...

i seem to remember something about a guitar and
its whammy bar posted to soc.singles and talk.bizarre.
this person is definately a dualist.

>gypsy @ ..!decuac.dec.com!c3pe
>"Does it now seem worth all the color of skies
> To see the earth through painted eyes?"
>                                -- Nick Drake

-=paul=-
justice, body smooth take over

gypsy@c3pe.UUCP (the virtually invulnerable gypsyroach) (03/23/88)

In article <1482@ucdavis.ucdavis.edu>, ccs026@deneb.ucdavis.edu (-=paul=-) writes:
> the virtually invulnerable gypsyroach writes:
> >JEEZUS, peoples.  i will not tell any of you what my own concept of 
> >individuality is because someone will either tell me i'm wrong or
> >imitate me.  fuck you all.  i will just sit here in my chair and
> >laugh.  ha ha ha... do you hear that?  i'm laughing at you!  ha ha ha...
> 
> i seem to remember something about a guitar and
> its whammy bar posted to soc.singles and talk.bizarre.
> this person is definately a dualist.
> 

this from the man who was unable to understand the obvious, simple warning
"May cause severe gastric distress if ingested" on a package of christmas
tinsel.  hee hee hee!  but seriously, folks...

i don't have to prove that i am an individual.  *i* know what i am, and
that's all that matters.

are you going to flame me, -=paul=-?  it's been *done*, you know...

gypsy @ ..!decuac.dec.com!c3pe

Life is a death sentence.