delagi@sumex-aim.stanford.edu (Bruce Delagi) (11/14/88)
In languages supporting futures, one could write something like (let ((b (future ...some-expression...)) (c (future ...other-expression...))) (if a (...an-expression-requiring-the-value-of-b) (...an-expression-requiring-the-value-of-c))) to get the effect of explicitly starting off optimistic calculations. Only one of the calculations would need to return a value to return a value for the form as specified above. If the pattern were useful enough, a macro could be provided encapsulating the pattern as a language construct I think. /bruce
wagner@june.cs.washington.edu (Bullwinkle J. Moose) (11/21/88)
In article <3532@hubcap.UUCP>, delagi@sumex-aim.stanford.edu (Bruce Delagi) writes: > In languages supporting futures, one could write something like > > (let ((b (future ...some-expression...)) > (c (future ...other-expression...))) > (if a (...an-expression-requiring-the-value-of-b) > (...an-expression-requiring-the-value-of-c))) > > to get the effect of explicitly starting off optimistic calculations. Only > one of the calculations would need to return a value to return a value for > the form as specified above. Yes, but the unused calculation would continue to completion, which could waste processor resources. Dave Wagner University of Washington Comp Sci Department wagner@cs.washington.edu {cornell,harvard,ssc-vax,tektronix}!uw-beaver!wagner