sjc@cs.purdue.edu (Steve Chapin) (04/30/91)
After mailing out 93 copies of this in the last 3 days, I have decided that it was worth posting after all. Of course, everyone who wants a copy has it now, but... this is in 2 parts, since it's > 64k. Here is the compilation of answers I received to my query about distributed programming environments. Before I list them, I would like to publicly apologize to the people in the Hermes group at IBM. I sent them a letter asking for an interpretation of their User Agreement *after* I posted my message, which was improper of me. I got a kind letter from Art Goldberg (included below) explaining that anything I copyright would remain my inetellectual property. Therefore, my objections to Herems were groundless, and I could have avoided wrongfully besmirching IBM and its employees by doing a little research first. Again, I apologize. In a nutshell, there were 2 highly touted systems: Isis and PVM. A few others were mentioned. All are listed below. On to the responses: =========================================================================== =========================================================================== From: vss@mathcs.emory.edu (V.S.Sunderam) Message-Id: <9104221310.AA16398@emory.mathcs.emory.edu> Subject: Re: Seeking Distributed Programming environments Hi, We have a distributed programming system that may suit your needs. Of course, it is available for free, and enhancements and/or modifications are encouraged and welcome. I'm enclosing a blurb on our project - please feel free to contact me if you need more information. BTW, who are you working with? Regards Vaidy Sunderam Emory University --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The PVM and HeNCE Projects Description PVM (Parallel Virtual Machine) is a software system that enables a collection of heterogeneous computer systems to be used as a general pur- pose concurrent computation resource. The individual machines may be mul- tiprocessors, vector supercomputers, specialized graphics engines, or scalar workstations, that are interconnected by a variety of networks. PVM support software executes on each machine in a user-configurable pool, and presents a unified, flexible, and powerful computational environment for concurrent applications. User programs, written in C or Fortran, use a library interface for access to PVM functions such as process management, communication, synchronization, and miscellaneous administrative tasks. A well-understood programming model, and ease of use are strengths of PVM; the system provides a high level of transparency, and is built on effective algorithms for networked based computing in a heterogeneous environment. An interactive interface permits montioring, status checking, and tracing application execution. HeNCE (Heterogeneous Network Computing Environment) is a graphical interface tool (under development) and methodology for using PVM. HeNCE permits the specification of applications using a variant of directed acy- clic graphs; individual nodes are associated with application modules and executed under PVM. During or after execution, HeNCE displays an event- ordered animation of application execution, enabling the visualization of relative computational speeds, processor utilization, load imbalances, and message traffic. A debugging component allows setting module-level break- points, while a separate display shows the allocation of modules to PVM host machines. HeNCE also supports the graphical configuration of PVM hosts, assists in the generation of architecture-dependent object modules, and contains provisions for task scheduling based on user supplied or system-estimated cost matrices. Applications and Environments PVM and HeNCE are ideally suited for concurrent applications composed of many interrelated but distinct sub-algorithms, although performance is good even for traditional parallel applications. PVM and HeNCE are particu- larly effective for heterogeneous applications that exploit specific strengths of individual machines on a network. As a loosely coupled con- current supercomputing environment, PVM is a viable scientific computing platform, while the support tools and interactive graphical facilities are valuable as an easy-to-use and convenient concurrent programming environ- ment. The PVM and HeNCE systems have been used for molecular dynamics simu- lations, superconductivity studies, distributed fractal computations, matrix algorithms, and in the classroom as the basis for teaching con- current computing. Status and Availability The beta release of the PVM system is now available and may be obtained by sending electronic mail to netlib@ornl.gov with the message "send index from pvm". This release contains a users guide and installation notes; PVM has been tested on Sun3, Sun4, Cray, Alliant, IBM RS6000, TMC CM2, Intel iPSC & RX, Sequent, and Stardent systems. The HeNCE interface is expected to be available in August 1991. Futures The PVM and HeNCE projects are ongoing, and support at levels appropriate to research projects may be reasonably expected. Over the next several months, newer releases of PVM and HeNCE are planned, with enhance- ments including fault tolerance, process migration, and shadow execution facilities, toolkits for the graphical assembly of concurrent applications >from skeleton templates, hierarchical visualization of application execu- tion, and concurrent debugging facilities. Contacts For more information, or if you have specific questions or comments, please send email to pvm@msr.epm.ornl.gov. =========================================================================== =========================================================================== From: elias@theory.TN.CORNELL.EDU (Doug Elias) Message-Id: <9104221814.AA22496@theory.TN.CORNELL.EDU> Subject: Seeking Distributed Programming environments Trollius, from the Cornell Theory Center, is available in source form for $300 for non-profit institutions, and is being used as the programming environment for loosely-coupled heterogeneous multicomputers, including Suns, RS6000s, and basically any other UNIX machine that uses Berkeley sockets for IPC. If you're interested, you can download all the user-documentation from theory via anonymous-ftp...login, then cd into transputer/docs -- there is a README file there, explaining what's what... Let me know if there is anything else i can do, doug ======================= # ____ |Internet: elias@theory.tn.cornell.edu #dr _|_)oug|USmail: Mgr., Adv. Comp. Res. Inst./Cornell Theory Center # (_| | 704A TheoryCtrBldg/C.U./Ithaca/N.Y./14853-3801 # (_|__ |MaBelle: 607-254-8826 Fax: 607-254-8888 =========================================================================== =========================================================================== From: moulton@cs.utk.edu Subject: Re: Seeking Distributed Programming environments Organization: University of Tennessee, Knoxville - CS Department In article <1991Apr22.122913.1660@hubcap.clemson.edu> you write: > >Greetings. I am seeking distributed programming systems for my PhD >research. I am interested in systems that allow programming of a >loosely-coupled heterogeneous multicomputer, and that are message >based. I intend to implement task partitioning and scheduling >algorithms that I am developing. If anyone knows of such a system >that does not place restrictions upon its use, I'm very interested in >hearing about it. > Currently under development: PVM: Parallel Virtual Machine - a set of architecture independent message passing subroutines. Includes calls for enrolling in PVM system, reseiving and sending messages, broadcasts. Since binary data may be sent, messages must be typed. However, binary data is converted to appropriate format for destination machine. PVM is available at netlib@ornl.gov. To get index of information available, send the following message to netlib: send index from pvm To get sources (pvm library and pvmd daemon), send pvm_shar from pvm. HeNCE: Heterogeneous Network Computing Environment: Consists of three pieces: xnb: draw dags describing algorithm. Associates subroutines with each node. When executed, HeNCE instrumented cod ewill automatically schedule tasks on processorin in the virtual machine (PVM) based on the user defined cost matrix and the program graph. xnt: View trace of program run. Animation shows which tasks are running where and when. Can be run either on trace file produced during run or while run is taking place. dag: Program that runs instumented program produced by xnb. xnb write wrapper routines to instrument the user code. While HeNCE uses PVM, all of the calls are encapsulated in the wrapper routines. The above pieces may be conjoined in various fashions. This is development software. If you are interested, I will see if I can get you sources. Things are still rather prototypical - I'd have to check with my advisor/boss (Dr. Jack Dongarra) to see if he wants to expose the public. Off of the top of my head, I'd say he would probably be happy to. - Steve Moulton -- Steve Moulton (moulton@cs.utk.edu) | I've always been more comfortable sinking University of Tennessee, Knoxville | while clutching a good theory than swim- Department of Computer Science | ming with an ugly fact. - David Mamet =========================================================================== =========================================================================== From: carr%car@cs.utah.edu (Harold Carr) Subject: Re: Seeking Distributed Programming environments Organization: CSS Ask Mark Swanson about Concurrent Scheme swanson@cs.utah.edu Harold [ note: I did; his reply is below ] =========================================================================== =========================================================================== From: walen@cs.ualberta.ca (Andrew E. Walenstein) Subject: Re: Seeking Distributed Programming environments Newsgroups: comp.parallel,comp.lang.misc,comp.lang.functional In comp.parallel you write: >Greetings. I am seeking distributed programming systems for my PhD >research. I am interested in systems that allow programming of a >loosely-coupled heterogeneous multicomputer, and that are message >based. I intend to implement task partitioning and scheduling >algorithms that I am developing. If anyone knows of such a system >that does not place restrictions upon its use, I'm very interested in >hearing about it. > >Oh, I'm just a lowly grad student whose professor has little to >nothing in the way of funding, so the cheaper, the better. > >------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >Steve Chapin domain: sjc@cs.purdue.edu UUCP: ...!purdue!sjc Well I'm also a lowly grad student, and I have just (like 6 hours ago) completed a survey paper on automated tools for MIMD parallelization for a course on parallel programming. If you are real desperate for a reference, I suppose I could email you the paper. I warn you that I did it haphazardly (read "last-minute") so it is not a `professional' survey. It contains some references to automated tools and programming environment, and a reference to a _real_ survey in a related field. Andrew Walenstein walen@cs.ualberta.ca =========================================================================== =========================================================================== From: Ignacio.Trejos-Zelaya@prg.oxford.ac.uk Subject: Re: Seeking Distributed Programming environments Organization: Oxford University Computing Laboratory, UK Dear Steve: I don't know whether this helps you, but check a recent article on comp.object announcing the availability of a portable implementation of POOL2 (that generates C). I'm starting to read about POOL and it looks nice, although I don't know whether it's suitable for your pruposes. Cheers, Ignacio =========================================================================== =========================================================================== From: ed@inmet.inmet.com (Ed Chianese) Message-Id: <9104231527.AA24623@squid.inmet.com> Subject: maybe isis I read a notes about ISIS which is a can be used to program distributed systems. Its available free from cornel. I will give you a copy of the note. /* Written 11:32 am Mar 18, 1991 by ken@cs.cornell.edu in squid:comp.parallel */ /* ---------- "Re: ISIS Toolkit" ---------- */ >Article 2371 in comp.parallel (moderated): >From: rbs@aiai.ed.ac.uk (Robert Scott) >Subject: ISIS of Cornell >Keywords: distributed computing, networks, parallelism >Message-ID: <1991Mar13.151443.13880@hubcap.clemson.edu> >Date: 13 Mar 91 13:54:19 GMT >Sender: fpst@hubcap.clemson.edu (Steve Stevenson) >Reply-To: rbs@aipna.ed.ac.uk >Organization: Department of AI, University of Edinburgh >Lines: 16 >How do I get hold of the ISIS suite of Cornell? >It allows one to setup distributed communications across >networked UNIX machines, I'm told. I hope this helps... It is a little stale by now, although not in any extreme way. I don't normally follow this newsgroup, but please feel free to email directly to me if you have any questions. In very crude terms, ISIS is used a lot like the Linda system, but where the emphasis in Linda is on anonymous communication, the ISIS emphasis is on a more conventional message passing model, but with rigorous semantics for "process groups" and group communication. For example, this lets us solve problems in fault-tolerance, or to subdivide a task using the current number of servers of some flavor as a parameter, in a way that can support dynamic reconfiguration. --- ISIS V2.1 blurb --- This is to announce the availability of a public distribution of the ISIS System, a toolkit for distributed and fault-tolerant programming. The initial version of ISIS runs on UNIX on SUN, DEC, GOULD, AUX and HP systems; ports to other UNIX-like systems are planned for the future. No kernel changes are needed to support ISIS; you just roll it in and should be able to use it immediately. The current implementation of ISIS performs well in networks of up to about 100-200 sites. Most users, however, run on a smaller number of sites (16-32 is typical) and other sites connect as "remote clients" that don't actually run ISIS directly. In this mode many hundreds of ISIS users can be clustered around a smaller set of ISIS "mother sites"; many users with large networks favor such an architecture. --- Who might find ISIS useful? --- You will find ISIS useful if you are interested in developing relatively sophisticated distributed programs under UNIX (eventu- ally, other systems too). These include programs that distribute computations over multiple processes, need fault-tolerance, coor- dinate activities underway at several places in a network, recover automatically from software and hardware crashes, and/or dynamically reconfigure while maintaining some sort of distri- buted correctness constraint at all times. ISIS is also useful in building certain types of distributed real time systems. Here are examples of problems to which ISIS has been applied: o On the factory floor, we are working with an industrial research group that is using ISIS to program decentralized cell controllers. They need to arrive at a modular, expand- able, fault-tolerant distributed system. ISIS makes it pos- sible for them to build such a system without a huge invest- ment of effort. (The ISIS group also working closely with an automation standards consortium called ANSA, headed by Andrew Herbert in Cambridge). o As part of a network file system, we built an interface to the UNIX NFS (we call ours "DECEIT") that supports tran- sparent file replication and fault-tolerance. DECEIT speaks NFS protocols but employs ISIS internally to maintain a consistent distributed state. For most operations, DECEIT performance is at worst 50-75% of that of a normal NFS -- despite supporting file replication and fault-tolerance. Interestingly, for many common operations, DECEIT substantially outperforms NFS (!) and it is actually fairly hard to come up with workloads that demonstate replication-related degradation. o A parallel "make" program. Here, ISIS was used within a control program that splits up large software recompilation tasks and runs them on idle workstations, tolerating failures and dynamically adapting if a workstation is reclaimed by its owner. o A system for monitoring and reacting to sensors scattered around the network, in software or in hardware. This system, Meta, is actually included as part of our ISIS V2.1 release. We are adding a high level language to it now, Lomita, in which you can specify reactive control rules or embed such rules into your C or Fortran code, or whatever. o In a hospital, we have looked at using ISIS to manage repli- cated data and to coordinate activities that may span multi- ple machines. The problem here is the need for absolute correctness: if a doctor is to trust a network to carry out orders that might impact on patient health, there is no room for errors due to race conditions or failures. At the same time, cost considerations argue for distributed systems that can be expanded slowly in a fully decentralized manner. ISIS addresses both of these issues: it makes it far easier to build a reliable, correct, distributed system that will manage replicated data and provide complex distributed behaviors. And, ISIS is designed to scale well. o For programming numerical algorithms. One group at Cornell used ISIS to distribute matrix computations over large numbers of workstations. They did this because the worksta- tions were available, mostly idle, and added up to a tremen- dous computational engine. Another group, at LANL, uses ISIS in a parallel plasma physics application. o In a graphics rendering application. Over an extended period, a Cornell graphics group (not even in our department) has used ISIS to build distributed rendering software for image generation. They basically use a set of machines as a parallel processor, with a server that farms out rendering tasks and a variable set of slave computing units that join up when their host machine is fairly idle and drop out if the owner comes back to use the machine again. This is a nice load sharing paradigm and makes for sexy demos too. o In a wide-area seismic monitoring system (i.e. a system that has both local-area networks and wide-area connections between them), developed by a company called SAIC on a DARPA contract. The system gathers seismic data remotely, preprocesses it, and ships event descriptions to a free-standing analysis "hub", which must run completely automatically (their people in San Diego don't like to be phoned in the middle of the night to debug problems in Norway). The hub may request data transfers and other complex computations, raising a number of wide-area programming problems. In addition, the hub system itself has a lot of programs in various languages and just keeping it running can be a challenge. o On brokerage and banking trading floors. Here, ISIS tends to be an adjunct to a technology for distributing quotes, because the special solutions for solving that specific problem are so fast that it is hard for us to compete with them (we normally don't have the freedom of specifying the hardware... many "ticker plant vendors" wire the whole floor for you). However, to the extent that these systems have problems requiring fault-tolerance, simple database integration mechanisms, dynamic restart of services, and in general need "reactive monitoring and control" mechanisms, ISIS works well. And, with our newer versions of the ISIS protocols, performance is actually good enough to handle distribution of stock quotes or other information directly in ISIS, although one has to be a bit careful in super performance intensive settings. (The commercial ISIS release should compete well with the sorts of commercial alternatives listed above on a performance basis, but more than 10 trading groups are using ISIS V2.1 despite the fact that it is definitely slower!). The problems above are characterized by several features. First, they would all be very difficult to solve using remote procedure calls or transactions against some shared database. They have complex, distributed correctness constraints on them: what hap- pens at site "a" often requires a coordinated action at site "b" to be correct. And, they do a lot of work in the application program itself, so that the ISIS communication mechanism is not the bottleneck. If you have an application like this, or are interested in taking on this kind of application, ISIS may be a big win for you. Instead of investing resources in building an environment within which to solve your application, using ISIS means that you can tackle the application immediately, and get something working much faster than if you start with RPC (remote procedure calls). On the other hand, don't think of ISIS as competing with RPC or database transactions. We are oriented towards online control and coordination problems, fault-tolerance of main-memory databases, etc. ISIS normally co-exists with other mechanisms, such as conventional streams and RPC, databases, or whatever. The system is highly portable and not very intrusive, and many of our users employ it to control some form of old code running a computation they don't want to touch at any price. --- What ISIS does --- The ISIS system has been under development for several years at Cornell University. After an initial focus on transactional "resilient objects", the emphasis shifted in 1986 to a toolkit style of programming. This approach stresses distributed con- sistency in applications that manage replicated data or that require distributed actions to be taken in response to events occurring in the system. An "event" could be a user request on a distributed service, a change to the system configuration result- ing from a process or site failure or recovery, a timeout, etc. The ISIS toolkit uses a subroutine call style interface similar to the interface to any conventional operating system. The pri- mary difference, however, is that ISIS functions as a meta- operating system. ISIS system calls result in actions that may span multiple processes and machines in the network. Moreover, ISIS provides a novel "virtual consistency" property to its users. This property makes it easy to build software in which currently executing processes behave in a coordinated way, main- tain replicated data, or otherwise satisfy a system-wide correct- ness property. Moreover, virtual synchrony makes even complex operations look atomic, which generally implies that toolkit functions will not interfere with one another. One can take advantage of this to develop distributed ISIS software in a sim- ple step-by-step style, starting with a non-distributed program, then adding replicated data or backup processes for fault- tolerance or higher availability, then extending the distributed solution to support dynamic reconfiguration, etc. ISIS provides a really unique style of distributed programming -- at least if your distributed computing problems run up against the issues we address. For such applications, the ISIS programming style is both easy and intuitive. ISIS is really intended for, and is good at, problems that draw heavily on replication of data and coordination of actions by a set of processes that know about one another's existence. For example, in a factory, one might need to coordinate the actions of a set of machine-controlled drills at a manufacturing cell. Each drill would do its part of the overall work to be done, using a coordinated scheduling policy that avoids collisions between the drill heads, and with fault-tolerance mechanisms to deal with bits breaking. ISIS is ideally suited to solving prob- lems like this one. Similar problems arise in any distributed setting, be it local-area network software for the office or a CAD problem, or the automation of a critical care system in a hospital. ISIS is not intended for transactional database applications. If this is what you need, you should obtain one of the many such systems that are now available. On the other hand, ISIS would be useful if your goal is to build a front-end in a setting that needs databases. The point is that most database systems are designed to avoid interference between simultaneously executing processes. If your application also needs cooperation between processes doing things concurrently at several places, you may find this aspect hard to solve using just a database because databases force the interactions to be done indirectly through the shared data. ISIS is good for solving this kind of problem, because it provides a direct way to replicate control informa- tion, coordinate the actions of the front-end processes, and to detect and react to failures. ISIS itself runs as a user-domain program on UNIX systems sup- porting the TCP/IP protocol suite. It currently is operational on SUN, DEC, GOULD and HP versions of UNIX. Language interfaces for C, C++, FORTRAN, and Common LISP (both Lucid and Allegro) are included, and a new C-Prolog interface is being tested now. Recent ports available in V2.1 include AUX for the Apple Mac. II, AIX on the IBM RS/6000 and also the older PC/RT. A Cray UNICOS port is (still) under development at LANL, and a DEC VMS port has being done by ISIS Distributed Systems, Inc. ISIS runs over Mach on anything that supports Mach but will probably look a little unnatural to you if you use the Mach primitives. We are planning a version of ISIS that would be more transparent in a Mach context, but it will be some time before this becomes available. Meanwhile, you can use ISIS but may find some aspects of the interface inconsistent with the way that Mach does things. The actual set of tools includes the following: o High performance mechanisms supporting lightweight tasks in UNIX, a simple message-passing facility, and a very simple and uniform addressing mechanism. Users do not work directly with things like ports, sockets, binding, connect- ing, etc. ISIS handles all of this. o A process "grouping" facility, which permits processes to dynamically form and leave symbolically-named associations. The system serializes changes to the membership of each group: all members see the same sequence of changes. Groups names can be used as a location-transparent address. o A suite of broadcast protocols integrated with a group addressing mechanism. This suite operates in a way that makes it look as if all broadcasts are received "simultane- ously" by all the members of a group, and are received in the same "view" of group membership. o Ways of obtaining distributed executions. When a request arrives in a group, or a distributed event takes place, ISIS supports any of a variety of execution styles, ranging from a redundant computation to a coordinator-cohort computation in which one process takes the requested actions while oth- ers back it up, taking over if the coordinator fails. o Replicated data with 1-copy consistency guarantees. o Synchronization facilities, based on token passing or read/write locks. o Facilities for watching a for a process or site (computer) to fail or recover, triggering execution of subroutines pro- vided by the user when the watched-for event occurs. If several members of a group watch for the same event, all will see it at the same "time" with respect to arriving mes- sages to the group and other events, such as group member- ship changes. o A facility for joining a group and atomically obtaining copies of any variables or data structures that comprise its "state" at the instant before the join takes place. The programmer who designs a group can specify state information in addition to the state automatically maintained by ISIS. o Automatic restart of applications when a computer recovers from a crash, including log-based recovery (if desired) for cases when all representatives of a service fail simultane- ously. o Ways to build transactions or to deal with transactional files and database systems external to ISIS. ISIS itself doesn't know about files or transactions. However, as noted above, this tool is pretty unsophisticated as transactional tools go... o Spooler/long-haul mechanism, for saving data to be sent to a group next time it recovers, or for sending from one ISIS LAN to another, physically remote one (e.g. from your Norway site to your San Diego installation). Note: ISIS will not normally run over communication links subject to frequent failures. The long-haul interface, however, has no such restrictions. o Network resource manager. This utility program is available from ISIS Distributed Systems Inc. It sweeps idle machines into a pool onto which it schedules programs upon request, picking the least loaded machine of the appropriate architecture. Everything in ISIS is fault-tolerant. Our programming manual has been written in a tutorial style, and gives details on each of these mechanisms. It includes examples of typical small ISIS applications and how they can be solved. The distribution of the system includes demos, such as the parallel make facility men- tioned above; this large ISIS application program illustrates many system features. To summarize, ISIS provides a broad range of tools, including some that require algorithms that would be very hard to support in other systems or to implement by hand. Performance is quite good: most tools require between 1/100 and 1/25 second to execute on a SUN 3/60, although the actual numbers depend on how big processes groups get, the speed of the network, the locations of processes involved, etc. Overall, however, the system is really quite fast when compared with, say, file access over the network. For certain common operations a five to ten-fold performance improvement is expected within two years, as we implement a col- lection of optimizations. The system scales well with the size of the network, and system overhead is largely independent of network size. On a machine that is not participating in any ISIS application, the overhead of having ISIS running is negligible. In certain communication scenarios, ISIS performance can be quite good. These involve streaming data within a single group or certain client-server interaction patterns, and make use of a new BYPASS communication protocol suite. Future ISIS development is likely to stress extensions and optimizations at this level of the system. In addition, a lot of effort is going into scaling the system to larger environments. --- You can get a copy of ISIS now --- Version V2.1 of ISIS is now fully operational and is being made available to the public. This version consists of a C implementations for UNIX, and has been ported to AIX, SUN, UNIX, MACH, ULTRIX, Gould UNIX, HP-UX, AUX and APOLLO UNIX (release 10.1). Performance is uniformly good. A 400 page tutorial and sys- tem manual containing numerous programming examples is also available. Online manual pages are also provided. The remainder of this posting focuses on how to get ISIS, and how to get the manual. Everything is free except bound copies of the manual. Source is included, but the system is in the public domain, and is released on condition that any ports to other sys- tems or minor modifications remain in the public domain. The manual is copyrighted by the project and is available in hard- copy form or as a DVI file, with figures available for free on request. We have placed a compressed TAR images in the following places: * cu-arpa.cs.cornell.edu (anonymous login, binary mode pub/ISISV21.TAR.Z) * Doc: cu-arpa.cs.cornell.edu (pub/ISISV21-DOC.TAR.Z) * uunet.uu.net (anonymous login, binary mode networks/ISIS/ISISV21.TAR.Z) * mcsun.eu.net (anonymous login, binary mode networks/ISIS/ISISV21.TAR.Z) Also available are DVI and PS versions of our manual. Bound copies will be available at $30 each. A package of figures to glue into the DVI version will be provided free of charge. A tape containing ISIS will be provided upon payment of a charge to cover our costs in making the tape. Our resources are limited and we do not wish to do much of this. --- Copyright, restrictions --- V2.1 of ISIS is subject to a restrictive copyright; basically, you can use it without changing it in any way you like, but are not permitted to develop "derivative versions" without discussing this with us. V2.1 differs substantially from V1.3.1, which was released in the public domain and remains available without any restrictions whatsoever. On the other hand, whereas previous versions of ISIS required export licenses to be sent to certain eastern-block countries, the present version seems not to be subject to this restriction. Contact the US Dept. of Commerce for details if you plan to export ISIS to a country that might be subject to restrictions. Any place in Europe, Japan, etc. should be fine and no license is required. --- Commercial support --- We are working with a local company, ISIS Distributed Systems Inc., to provide support services for ISIS. This company will prepare distributions and work to fix bugs. Support contracts are available for an annual fee; without a contract, we will do our best to be helpful but make no promises. Other services that IDS plans to provide will include consulting on fault-tolerant distributed systems design, instruction on how to work with ISIS, bug identification and fixes, and contractual joint software development projects. The company is also prepared to port ISIS to other systems or other programming languages. Contact "ids@isis.com" (or rcbc@cs.cornell.edu) for more information. The commercial release of ISIS has been available since January 1991. --- If you want ISIS V2.1, but have questions, let us know --- Send mail to isis@cs.cornell.edu, subject "I want ISIS", with electronic and physical mailing details. We will send you a form for acknowledging agreement with the conditions for release of the software and will later contact you with details on how to actually copy the system off our machine to yours. --- You can read more about ISIS if you like --- The following papers and documents are available from Cornell. We don't distribute papers by e-mail. Requests for papers should be transmitted to "isis@cs.cornell.edu". 1. Exploiting replication. K. Birman and T. Joseph. This is a preprint of a chapter that will appear in: Arctic 88, An advanced course on operating systems, Tromso, Norway (July 1988). 50pp. 2. Reliable broadcast protocols. T. Joseph and K. Birman. This is a preprint of a chapter that will appear in: Arctic 88, An advanced course on operating systems, Tromso, Norway (July 1988). 30pp. 3. ISIS: A distributed programming environment. User's guide and reference manual. K. Birman, T. Joseph, F. Schmuck. Cornell University, March 1988. 275pp. 4. Exploiting virtual synchrony in distributed systems. K. Birman and T. Joseph. Proc. 11th ACM Symposium on Operating Systems Principles (SOSP), Nov. 1987. 12pp. 5. Reliable communication in an unreliable environment. K. Birman and T. Joseph. ACM Transactions on Computer Systems, Feb. 1987. 29pp. 6. Low cost management of replicated data in fault-tolerant distributed systems. T. Joseph and K. Birman. ACM Transac- tions on Computer Systems, Feb. 1986. 15pp. 7. Fast causal multicast. K. Birman, A. Schiper, P. Stephenson. Dept. of Computer Science TR, May 1990. 8. Distributed application management. K. Marzullo, M. Wood, R. Cooper, K. Birman. Dept. of Computer Science TR, June 1990. We will be happy to provide reprints of these papers. Unless we get an overwhelming number of requests, we plan no fees except for the manual. We also maintain a mailing list for individuals who would like to receive publications generated by the project on an ongoing basis. The last two papers can be copied using FTP >from cu-arpa.cs.cornell.edu. If you want to learn about the virtual synchrony as an approach to distributed computing, the best place to start is with refer- ence [1]. If you want to learn more about the ISIS system, how- ever, start with the manual. It has been written in a tutorial style and should be easily accessible to anyone familiar with the C programming language. References [7] and [8] are typical of our recent publications (there are others -- contact Maureen Robinson for details). -- ---------------------------------- Kenneth P. Birman E-mail: ken@cs.cornell.edu 4105 Upson Hall, Dept. of Computer Science TEL: 607 255-9199 (office) Cornell University Ithaca, NY 14853 (USA) FAX: 607 255-4428 -- =========================== MODERATOR ============================== Steve Stevenson {steve,fpst}@hubcap.clemson.edu Department of Computer Science, comp.parallel Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634-1906 (803)656-5880.mabell =========================================================================== =========================================================================== From: swanson%teewinot@cs.utah.edu (Mark Swanson) To: sjc Subject: Re: Greetings Well, that's a good question. Here's a (not-quite-randomly-chosen) paragraph from my thesis: Concurrent Scheme extends standard Scheme with the addition of four types and their associated operations. It also imposes modifications to the semantics of certain common operations. The following sections will discuss the new types, operations, and restrictions; a reader starting with a knowledge of standard Scheme should have a complete understanding of CS by the end of this chapter. Several of the concepts and mechanisms specified in this chapter: domains, delay queues, delegation, and emigration (under the name {\bf forward}) are derived from the Hybrid language\cite{Nierstrasz}. The new types introduced will be {\it thread, domain, placeholder, and gateway}; each will be discussed in a major section but their interdependence will necessitate some amount of forward-referencing. Now that doesn't tell you much, right? It would probably be more informative if you had the rest of the document. It'll become Tech. Report number something or other as soon as I defend (next week). Of more interest to you, perhaps, is what would be involed in modifying it. It's built on top of Utah Lisp, which is a "kernel" we use to build Common Lisp, Scheme, and Standard Lisp. So it's mostly Lisp-in-Lisp (CL syntax). The concurrency stuff is written in UL, too. UL is a subset of CL, though not as minimal as I would like. The Scheme compiler is based on our UCL compiler and is written in UCL. So you would need our complete suite to be able to change fundamentals. We'd be happy to give you a copy, provided you understand that it's not a product (i.e., we'd love to hear about bugs but can't guarantee when they'll be fixed) and that you don't redistribute it, as we may decide to make a product out of it and as we want to know who is using it and where it has gone. You need the compiler because the current Concurrent Scheme implementation only supports compiled procedures. There is a read-eval-print loop, but we don't handle interpreted functions very well (the explanation for this is a long one unless you understand Concurrent Scheme quite well). =========================================================================== =========================================================================== From: rfinch@locke.water.ca.gov (Ralph Finch) Organization: Calif. Dept. of Water Resources, Sac. Subject: Re: Seeking Distributed Programming environments Consider ISIS: ftp.cs.cornell.edu pub: 1272869 Sep 19 1990 ISISV21-DOC.TAR.Z ftp.cs.cornell.edu pub: 1767509 Sep 19 1990 ISISV21.TAR.Z -- Ralph Finch 916-445-0088 rfinch@water.ca.gov ...ucbvax!ucdavis!caldwr!rfinch Any opinions expressed are my own; they do not represent the DWR =========================================================================== =========================================================================== From: adamb@cs.utk.edu Subject: Re: Seeking Distributed Programming environments Organization: University of Tennessee, Knoxville - CS Department In article <1991Apr22.122913.1660@hubcap.clemson.edu> you write: > >Greetings. I am seeking distributed programming systems for my PhD >research. I am interested in systems that allow programming of a >loosely-coupled heterogeneous multicomputer, and that are message >based. ... If anyone knows of such a system >that does not place restrictions upon its use, I'm very interested in >hearing about it. ... >nothing in the way of funding, so the cheaper, the better. Have we got a deal for you. We have a system called PVM that can be used to write parallel programs to be distributed over a heterogeneous network of machines. It's free and you can get it by sending email to "netlib@ornl.gov" where the mail message contains the string: "send index from pvm". Here is a postscript document describing PVM: I think this will be what you are looking for. Adam Dr. Adam Beguelin, adamb@cs.utk.edu UT 615-974-8295 ORNL 574-4158, Fax 974-8296 Department of Computer Science Mathematical Sciences Section University of Tennessee Oak Ridge National Laboratory Knoxville, TN 37996-1301 Oak Ridge, TN 37831-8083 %!PS-Adobe-1.0 %%Creator: eclipse:vss (V.S.Sunderam,216 Fishburne,7275926,2974135) %%Title: stdin (ditroff) %%CreationDate: Fri Mar 22 10:19:04 1991 %%EndComments % Start of psdit.pro -- prolog for ditroff translator % Copyright (c) 1985,1987 Adobe Systems Incorporated. All Rights Reserved. % GOVERNMENT END USERS: See Notice file in TranScript library directory % -- probably /usr/lib/ps/Notice % RCS: $Header: psdit.pro,v 2.2 87/11/17 16:40:42 byron Rel $ /$DITroff 140 dict def $DITroff begin %% Psfig additions /DocumentInitState [ matrix currentmatrix currentlinewidth currentlinecap currentlinejoin currentdash currentgray currentmiterlimit ] cvx def /startFig { /SavedState save def userdict maxlength dict begin currentpoint transform DocumentInitState setmiterlimit setgray setdash setlinejoin setlinecap setlinewidth setmatrix itransform moveto /ury exch def /urx exch def /lly exch def /llx exch def /y exch 72 mul resolution div def /x exch 72 mul resolution div def currentpoint /cy exch def /cx exch def /sx x urx llx sub div def % scaling for x /sy y ury lly sub div def % scaling for y sx sy scale % scale by (sx,sy) cx sx div llx sub cy sy div ury sub translate /DefFigCTM matrix currentmatrix def /initmatrix { DefFigCTM setmatrix } def /defaultmatrix { DefFigCTM exch copy } def /initgraphics { DocumentInitState setmiterlimit setgray setdash setlinejoin setlinecap setlinewidth setmatrix DefFigCTM setmatrix } def /showpage { initgraphics } def } def % Args are llx lly urx ury (in figure coordinates) /clipFig { currentpoint 6 2 roll newpath 4 copy 4 2 roll moveto 6 -1 roll exch lineto exch lineto exch lineto closepath clip newpath moveto } def % doclip, if called, will always be just after a `startfig' /doclip { llx lly urx ury clipFig } def /endFig { end SavedState restore } def /globalstart { % Push details about the enviornment on the stack. fontnum fontsize fontslant fontheight firstpage mh my resolution slotno currentpoint pagesave restore gsave } def /globalend { grestore moveto /slotno exch def /resolution exch def /my exch def /mh exch def /firstpage exch def /fontheight exch def /fontslant exch def /fontsize exch def /fontnum exch def F /pagesave save def } def %% end XMOD additions /fontnum 1 def /fontsize 10 def /fontheight 10 def /fontslant 0 def /xi {0 72 11 mul translate 72 resolution div dup neg scale 0 0 moveto /fontnum 1 def /fontsize 10 def /fontheight 10 def /fontslant 0 def F /pagesave save def}def /PB{save /psv exch def currentpoint translate resolution 72 div dup neg scale 0 0 moveto}def /PE{psv restore}def /m1 matrix def /m2 matrix def /m3 matrix def /oldmat matrix def /tan{dup sin exch cos div}bind def /point{resolution 72 div mul}bind def /dround {transform round exch round exch itransform}bind def /xT{/devname exch def}def /xr{/mh exch def /my exch def /resolution exch def}def /xp{}def /xs{docsave restore end}def /xt{}def /xf{/fontname exch def /slotno exch def fontnames slotno get fontname eq not {fonts slotno fontname findfont put fontnames slotno fontname put}if}def -- =========================== MODERATOR ============================== Steve Stevenson {steve,fpst}@hubcap.clemson.edu Department of Computer Science, comp.parallel Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634-1906 (803)656-5880.mabell