ewhac@well.UUCP (Leo 'Bols Ewhac' Schwab) (04/26/88)
[ Drat! ]
Having used Wack a number of times, allow me to contribute my
information.
Wack requires a 9600 baud terminal (you can't change the baud rate,
period). Wack also works better if you have an 80-column screen, since many
of the status reports assume such a screen.
Given that the Sic-20 only has -- what? -- a 22-column screen, and
I seriously doubt that it could keep up with a 9600 baud dataflow (the C-64
can barely handle 1200 baud), I don't think the Sic-20 would make a good
Wack terminal.
I'd also lay odds that, if you were to plug a Sic-20 into an Amiga
in any form, the Amiga would Guru with 41636B21.50686674.
_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_
Leo L. Schwab -- The Guy in The Cape ihnp4!pacbell -\
\_ -_ Recumbent Bikes: dual ---> !{well,unicom}!ewhac
O----^o The Only Way To Fly. hplabs / (pronounced "AE-wack")
"Work FOR? I don't work FOR anybody! I'm just having fun." -- The Doctor