paolucci@snll-arpagw.UUCP (Sam Paolucci) (11/01/88)
OK. I understand the meanings of re-executable and reentrant programs. Now what I need is a specific set of rules one must follow in writing a program so that the resulting program is PURE. -- -+= SAM =+- "the best things in life are free" ARPA: paolucci@snll-arpagw.llnl.gov
papa@pollux.usc.edu (Marco Papa) (11/02/88)
In article <18@snll-arpagw.UUCP> paolucci@snll-arpagw.UUCP (Sam Paolucci) writes: >OK. I understand the meanings of re-executable and reentrant programs. >Now what I need is a specific set of rules one must follow in writing >a program so that the resulting program is PURE. Carolyn Scheppner gave a talk at DevCon '88 just about that topic. Her notes are part of the Conference Notes, and should be available from CATS some time in the future in a galaxy near you :-) Lauren, any details on release dates for DevCon Notes? -- Marco Papa 'Doc' -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= uucp:...!pollux!papa BIX:papa ARPAnet:pollux!papa@oberon.usc.edu "There's Alpha, Beta, Gamma and Diga!" -- Leo Schwab [quoting Rick Unland] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
ba@m-net.UUCP (Bill Allen) (11/03/88)
>Now what I need is a specific set of rules one must follow >in writing a program so that the resulting program is PURE >(and Resident-able). And a definitive Yes/No answer for existing commands. The trial-and-error resident-able test recommended in the manual is less than ideal. -- --------------------------------------------------------- Reply-To: ba@m-net.UUCP (Bill Allen Beogelein) Organization: M-NET, Ann Arbor, MI ---------------------------------------------------------