sjk@ut-emx.UUCP (bob) (07/17/90)
I am thinking about undertaking a major programming project and the more I read about C++, the more it seems to be well-suited for the job. My question then is how is the Lattice C++ compiler? How compatible is it with C++ running on other systems? My work will need to be ported to other machines (VAX, SUN, PeeCee.) And last, how does the speed of execution compare to a similar code written in standard C? Thanks; any input is much appreciated, Scot sjk@astro.as.utexas.edu sjk@emx.utexas.eu -Yow!
lphillips@lpami.wimsey.bc.ca (Larry Phillips) (07/18/90)
In <1990Jul18.020220.9502@msuinfo.cl.msu.edu>, dailey@kira.uucp (Chris Dailey) writes: >More importantly, how do you say it? I've heard some people say "C >incremented", but I always say "C plus plus". I can hardly waiyt for other object oriented programming languages: ADD ONE TO COBOL LET BASIC = BASIC + 1 FORTH 1 + INC Modula-2 (+ LISP 1) addq.l #1,assembler -larry -- The raytracer of justice recurses slowly, but it renders exceedingly fine. +-----------------------------------------------------------------------+ | // Larry Phillips | | \X/ lphillips@lpami.wimsey.bc.ca -or- uunet!van-bc!lpami!lphillips | | COMPUSERVE: 76703,4322 -or- 76703.4322@compuserve.com | +-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
dailey@kira.uucp (Chris Dailey) (07/18/90)
More importantly, how do you say it? I've heard some people say "C incremented", but I always say "C plus plus". Anyway, as far as I know it is based on AT&T's cfront, and there has been some dispute as to whether it is based on cfront 1.1a or 1.2. At any rate, it would have some compatibility with other platforms. -- /~\ Chris Dailey (CPS Undergrad, SOC Lab Coord, AMIG user group Secretary) C oo dailey@(cpsin1.cps|frith.egr).msu.edu (make WP5.1 for the Amiga) _( ^) "I am thankful for one leg. To limp is no disgrace -- / ~\ I may not be number one, but I can still run the race." -from B.C.
ken@cbmvax.commodore.com (Ken Farinsky - CATS) (07/18/90)
In article <1990Jul18.020220.9502@msuinfo.cl.msu.edu> dailey@kira.uucp (Chris Dailey) writes: >More importantly, how do you say it? I've heard some people say "C >incremented", but I always say "C plus plus". Common usage says "C plus plus" (although I think that this sounds stupid.) I prefer "C increment". The first article I ever read on C++ said "C increment", all others have said "C plus plus", or punted and only used the literal "C++". -- -- Ken Farinsky - CATS - (215) 431-9421 - Commodore Business Machines uucp: ...{uunet,rutgers}!cbmvax!ken bix: kfarinsky
duncan@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Shan D Duncan) (07/18/90)
From article <13271@cbmvax.commodore.com>, by ken@cbmvax.commodore.com (Ken Farinsky - CATS): > In article <1990Jul18.020220.9502@msuinfo.cl.msu.edu> dailey@kira.uucp (Chris Dailey) writes: >>More importantly, how do you say it? I've heard some people say "C >>incremented", but I always say "C plus plus". > > Common usage says "C plus plus" (although I think that this sounds stupid.) > I prefer "C increment". The first article I ever read on C++ said > "C increment", all others have said "C plus plus", or punted and only > used the literal "C++". > > -- > -- > Ken Farinsky - CATS - (215) 431-9421 - Commodore Business Machines > uucp: ...{uunet,rutgers}!cbmvax!ken > bix: kfarinsky What about C more as in Semour (or however you spell the person's name).