[comp.sys.amiga.tech] ARP - my 2 cents

jayl@watcsc.waterloo.edu (Jay Lawrence) (11/23/90)

I fear that I may be making an incorrect non-causal relationship, but
here's my opinion.

After reading some of the postings on the subject of ARP (many of them very
insightful..thank you!) I decided to rid myself of all of the commands save
the library.  I have been using ARP ever since it came out.  The wild carding
was very handy compared to commodore's (so I think!?).  This was also when
I was still floppy based..space concerns.  This system simply got x-fered
over to the HD once I got that.

After using true commodore commands I have felt that the reliablity of my
system has increased SIGNIFICANTLY.  I would, on this basis, and no offence
to the creators of ARP, recommend sticking with commodore programs.  The
shell was not to my liking so I installed SKsh.  (I am sorry, but I can't
remember the author's name off-hand)  Thank you for SKsh it is very pleasant
to work in.  I am suffering no side effects from going over to this en-
vioronment.

Conclusion:  if you want (possible) increased reliablity....use commodore
commands.

Jay Lawrence

-- 
        //                    ______
       // Warning:            \    /  <- Pretend its a lovely shade
   \\ //  Pretentious          \  /      of ~~!HOT!~~ PINK!  Hmm?
    \X/   Amiga user at large!  \/  (that's at, NOT is!!!  ;-)