steele@EE.ECN.PURDUE.EDU (Richard A. Steele) (03/13/90)
I'm not so sure anything but the simplest programs will convert to the
HP48SX without some modification: some functions, though they seem to
do the same thing as the 28S, return different arguments. The
one that comes to mind is RCLF. If I recall (no pun intended, of course)
correctly, this returns _two_ 64-bit binary object in a list, whereas
the 28S only returned a single 64-bit number.
No, I can't think of any others off-hand, but I don't think a 28S --> 48SX
conversion will be trivial.
BTW: Anyone notice that the TRACE command of the 28S is missing in the 48SX?
Or have I just overlooked it? TRACE came in handy while debugging programs.
And, yes, I also used it to help me balance my checkbook....
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Richard Steele | INTERNET : steele@en.ecn.purdue.edu
Electrical Engineering | BITNET : steele%ea.ecn.purdue.edu@purccvm
Purdue University | UUCP : {purdue, pur-ee}!en.ecn.purdue.edu!steele
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclaimer: I'm just an undergrad, so I really don't know what I'm talking
about...