6600kntp@ucsbuxa.ucsb.edu (Kent Perrier) (09/30/90)
In article <20093.270473cf@oregon.uoregon.edu> michelbi@oregon.uoregon.edu writes: >What happenned to the very nice UNDO feature that is present on the 28x >but not on the 48SX? Can a similar function be implemented on the SX? >Michel Biedermann michelbi@oregon.uoregon.edu >U. of Oregon There is one. It is the shift 2 and the shift 3. Actually it is bette than the undo on e 28. In my opinion at least. Kent Perrier 6600kntp@ucsbuxa.ucsb.edu
sjthomas@cup.portal.com (Stephen J Thomas) (10/01/90)
On the 48SX, the UNDO function is renames LAST STACK......I think UNDO is catchier! steve thomas sjthomas@cup.portal.com sun!portal!cup.portal.com!sjthomas
ags@seaman.cc.purdue.edu (Dave Seaman) (10/01/90)
In article <34421@cup.portal.com> sjthomas@cup.portal.com (Stephen J Thomas) writes: >On the 48SX, the UNDO function is renames LAST STACK......I think UNDO is >catchier! steve thomas But UNDO would be an inaccurate name, unless it truly undoes the previous operation (such as a STO or ASN or CLVAR, for example). -- Dave Seaman ags@seaman.cc.purdue.edu