jacobsd@mist.cs.orst.edu (Dana Jacobsen) (10/03/90)
On a number or my integration problems, an adaptive approach seems better than the plain iterative method that is standard with the 28S and 48SX. Why didn't HP use adaptive integration? I suppose it could be ROM space, but they don't seem that large. Any clues? I wrote an adaptive Gaussian Quadrature program for the 28S and will write it for the 48SX when I get mine (tomorrow). Has anyone else done any work with this? I'd like some information on writing it in a faster language (CHIP48? Machine?) also. I'll post the program if there's interest. Thanks, -- -- Dana Jacobsen Oregon State University jacobsd@cs.orst.edu Computer Science .!hplabs!hp-pcd!orstcs!jacobsd Dana_Jacobsen@RPITSMTS.BITNET `Once a daemon, always a daemon'