ram@tellabs.com (Bob Martin) (11/02/90)
In article <15985@mentor.cc.purdue.edu> ags@seaman.cc.purdue.edu (Dave Seaman) writes: >You are still missing the point. Locking lower case does not work only for the >NEXT time you select alpha (as you just said again), but for EVERY time you >select alpha within the current command line or editing session, unless you ^^^^^^^ >specifically cancel the lower case lock. That was my point. Try it. >Dave Seaman >ags@seaman.cc.purdue.edu You are still missing my point. After I'm no longer in the current command line or edit session, alpha lock produces upper case letters. I understood your point, but I'm not sure you understood mine. -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Bob Martin | ram@tellabs.com ...!uunet!tellab5!ram Tellabs, Inc. |"Listen to me now, and believe me later" - Hans & Franz Lisle, IL. 60532 |"Flibble-dee Floo" - Grumpy Old Man
ags@seaman.cc.purdue.edu (Dave Seaman) (11/02/90)
In article <4435@tellab5.tellabs.com> ram@tellabs.com (Bob Martin) writes: >You are still missing my point. After I'm no longer in the current command line >or edit session, alpha lock produces upper case letters. I understood your >point, but I'm not sure you understood mine. You have never given any supporting evidence for your statements. What have I said that made you think I didn't understand your point? I took great pains to avoid contradicting your point, which I explained in my previous message. What have you said that wasn't a contradiction of my point, which you claim you understood? If you still don't get it, please send me mail. -- Dave Seaman ags@seaman.cc.purdue.edu