apm279l@vaxc.cc.monash.edu.au (03/07/91)
In article <9103061800.AA07888@lilac.berkeley.edu>, SPGJAF@CMSA.BERKELEY.EDU (Joseph A. Faracchio {415} 642-7638 {w}) writes: > I vote we do something! The HP48 discussions overwhelm me. I waste too much > time wading though the list looking for non-HP discussions that I haven't any > time left to say anything. > > Our mail server must gather 50 messages about HP's every day. And when I'm > busy or away I have to wade through hundreds of messages to find nothing of > interest to me. > > The HP48 people deserve their own list. Then the rest of us can get on with > other less voluminous discussions and choose to look at / not look at the HP48 > stuff. > > If there was less (48) traffic I would also subscribe directly and be able to > participate much more frequently and more timely than I have. Here Here - my sentiments precisely. I'm a 28 user, and will stay that way for the forseeable future. We get as squeezes as casio/sharp users, so I vote for Alonzo's suggestion: comp.sys.hp48. Peter