ayeh@sdcc13.ucsd.edu ({{{= Achilles =}}}) (04/03/91)
In article <51045@apple.Apple.COM> dan@Apple.COM (Dan Allen) writes: >other reason than the fact that the clamshell design of the 28S was >terrible! Let's hope that HP has learned their lesson on this one and >has NOT gone back to clamshell designs for its future machines. Rather, Isn't HP-95lx a clamsheel design? Also someone mentioned earlier that HP-95lx includes a hp-12C calculator program. But another person said that hp-95lx has complete scientific and business calculator capability. Which person is right? I think the 95lx will fail if its calculator can only do what hp-12C can do-a low power RPN business calculator! I will save my money for a Portofio AND a hp-48sx if that is to be true. -Albert