[comp.sys.handhelds] Battery test.

frechett@spot.Colorado.EDU (-=Runaway Daemon=-) (02/18/91)

More Version E Replacement mysteries. When I got my replacement Version
E they of course included new batteries. They would seem to be new and 
the calclator works fine.. BUT, when I run the diagnostic test, 
ON-D MTH   it says
ESD   210V    210V     


And NOTHING else.. There are no bars at all.. Now I distinctly remember 
doing this same test on other 48s including my old version C and they always
gave me the 4 bars in a pattern like.

ESD   210V    210V
       | |     | |
       | |     | |


Same as before, anyone else?  I don't think I have ever actually heard anyone 
say how to read the status of the batteries from the information given by this
test.  The manuals just say, "The bars indicate battery status".  Yeah right.

	ian

--
-=Runaway Daemon=-

akcs.dnickel@hpcvbbs.UUCP (Derek S. Nickel) (02/20/91)

Ian,

When ever I ran the ESD (electrostatic discharge?) test, my rev B would
just start beeping (forever), but know bars.

        Derek S. Nickel

frechett@spot.Colorado.EDU (-=Runaway Daemon=-) (02/20/91)

In article <27c16675:2089.1comp.sys.handhelds;1@hpcvbbs.UUCP> akcs.dnickel@hpcvbbs.UUCP (Derek S. Nickel) writes:
>Ian,
>When ever I ran the ESD (electrostatic discharge?) test, my rev B would
>just start beeping (forever), but know bars.
>        Derek S. Nickel
The thing is that I am 100% positive that my version C displayed little 
bars, along with the 210V stuff and the contunual beeping.  

IF you look in Jim Donnelley's handbook it says when in the diagnostic mode
that 
"[G]       ESD test monitor. Bars indicate battery status."

The regular manuals say nothing at all about this.  I suppose I will have to 
wait until the batteries get low.  I would like to know if the pressence of the
bars indicates that the batteries are getting low.  

	ian

-=Runaway Daemon=-

kenr@peabody.iusb.indiana.edu (Ken Rawlings) (02/21/91)

In article <1991Feb19.220821.12040@csn.org> frechett@spot.Colorado.EDU (-=Runaway Daemon=-) writes:
>The thing is that I am 100% positive that my version C displayed little 
>bars, along with the 210V stuff and the contunual beeping.  
>
>The regular manuals say nothing at all about this.  I suppose I will have to 
>wait until the batteries get low.  I would like to know if the pressence of the
>bars indicates that the batteries are getting low.  
>
>	ian


	I cannot give you a definitive answer on that. However, I replaced
the batteries in my Version E HP48SX with brand new alkaline batteries the
other day, and the diagnostic did show the bars. 


					-Ken Rawlings



--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Ken Rawlings / kenr@peabody.iusb.indiana.edu / Indiana University, South Bend
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

akcs.dnickel@hpcvbbs.UUCP (Derek S. Nickel) (02/21/91)

Ian,

I think Jim Donnelley might be wrong.  I am pretty sure (but I woudn't
put money on it) that ESD mean electrostatic discharge.  I mean, come on,
210 V batteries?  Yikes!  I think its some indication of how much ESD
that squeeks through on there electro-shock therapy tests.

        Derek S. Nickel

TNAN0@CCVAX.IASTATE.EDU (02/21/91)

When my calculator (ver. D) was new, I had two bars (one under each 210V).

When my calculator's batteries got low, I had the following:
ESD   210V   210V
      |  |   |  |
        ~~~ This bar flashed sporadically, then stayed on...

With new batteries, I get NO bars...  I can only assume this means that the
bars indicate varying levels of...   Hold on, I just figured it out!

Ok, the:
210 represents ports 2, 1, and 0 (system).  If NO cards are present, port 2
always gets bars under it (under both 2's) -- Why? I dunno...  See if this
happens on yours... (If not, perhaps there is something wrong with my port 2).
Rom cards always return good voltage (or so it seems).  RAM cards will show
bars if their batteries are low and port 0 will show bars if the AAA 
batteries are low.  Apparently, the bar on the left is a real-time display
of the test (for example, if the batteries are semi-low, these bars may
flash as the test passes and fails).  The bars on the right latch a failed
test on the left.  In other words, if at any time during the test, a port
fails, the bar on the left will flash and the bar on the right will stay on.

Can someone confirm these results?  (Whether or not bars ever appear under
the ESD or Vs I cannot tell...  Does Jim's book mention what these represent?)

So, basically, the 2 is P2, the 1 is P1, and the 0 is S in the LowBat(S,P1,P2)
message...

Apparently, the readings you get without cards in the ports are not reliable.
They change from "bar" to "nobar" to "flashing bar" depending on the level of
the batteries in the 48sx and some function of cosmic ray intensity...

---Xeno

P.S. My Smith-Corona 32K card is still running GREAT, with no errors of any
type.  I've tried it with weak and strong batteries (and with no backup battery
in the card) and it still has its memory intact...  However, I have NOT
performed a great number of WRITE operations to it...  I think I'm going to
create a program to hit it with thousands of write/reads and see if the data
stays intact...  I'll report my results as soon as I can...  Oh yeah, and mine
has the sticker with the instructions on the back.

akcs.falco@hpcvbbs.UUCP (Andrey Dolgachev) (03/02/91)

This is very strange.  I tried ON-D  and then G on my Ver D HP48sx with
week-old batteries and I got the diagnostic with no bars.  I then put in
my previous set of batteries (the caluclator lights up with a lowbat(s)
indicator) and then tried the diagnostic.  I got two lines in the
diagnostic, onw underneat each 210v.  
Now, Ken Rawlings said that he tried his ver E with fresh batteries and
he got bars.  My question to him is how many bars he had?
And, ian got no bars with fresh batteries.
According to me and ian, the bars seem to indicate a low battery status,
no bars means fresh, bars means low.  But Ken's is different.  What is
up?  Anyone else want to experiment with this?
     ---Falco

kenr@peabody.iusb.indiana.edu (Ken Rawlings) (03/03/91)

In article <27cf06a2:2089.5comp.sys.handhelds;1@hpcvbbs.UUCP> akcs.falco@hpcvbbs.UUCP (Andrey Dolgachev) writes:
>This is very strange.  I tried ON-D  and then G on my Ver D HP48sx with
>week-old batteries and I got the diagnostic with no bars.  I then put in
>my previous set of batteries (the caluclator lights up with a lowbat(s)
>indicator) and then tried the diagnostic.  I got two lines in the
>diagnostic, onw underneat each 210v.  
>Now, Ken Rawlings said that he tried his ver E with fresh batteries and
>he got bars.  My question to him is how many bars he had?

	Four bars total, one under each 0 and 2. BTW, I have the equation
card installed if that makes any difference. I supposed one of us may
have been buying batteries we thought were fresh but had been sitting on 
the shelf a long time.


					--- Ken

>     ---Falco

--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Ken Rawlings / kenr@peabody.iusb.indiana.edu / Indiana University, South Bend
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

frechett@spot.Colorado.EDU (-=Runaway Daemon=-) (03/03/91)

In article <27cf06a2:2089.5comp.sys.handhelds;1@hpcvbbs.UUCP> akcs.falco@hpcvbbs.UUCP (Andrey Dolgachev) writes:
>This is very strange.  I tried ON-D  and then G on my Ver D HP48sx with
>week-old batteries and I got the diagnostic with no bars.  I then put in
....
>diagnostic, onw underneat each 210v.  
Let me guess.  You have at least one card in the calc and if you had looked
closer the line would have been under the 0 in 210V.  IF indeed that was the
case, then it says that port 0 (The calc) batteries were low.  If it had been
under the 2 or 1 it would have been ports 2 or 1 with low card batteries, and
apparently, that isn't always reliable if the card is not actually in the port.
In other words, you might not see a bar under the 2 if port two was empty.  I
have also played with this bye taking the batteries out of my RAM cards while
running the test, and found that if I took the battery out of the SC 32K RAM
card in port two I got the bar under 2 and if I took the battery out of the CMT
128K RAM card in port 1 it wouldn't put the bar there.  My theory is that the
CMT card is drawing so little (see previously posted stats) that it doesn't
even know that its battery is missing for a while.  Interesting feature though.

	ian

-=Runaway Daemon=-

akcs.falco@hpcvbbs.UUCP (Andrey Dolgachev) (03/04/91)

Yup, it's been solved.  The 0, 1, 2 indicate the main calc, port 1 and
port 2.  A line underneath the number indicates that the batteries are
low in that area.  
   --Falco

jcohen@lehi3b15.csee.Lehigh.EDU (Josh Cohen [890918]) (03/14/91)

The way I have found this battery test to be, ON-D g(mth)
it shows 210, but actually they represent the ports.  ports 2 1 and 0
0 which is the internal port.  A bar under the corresponding port number
means that their is a weak or no batt in that slot, hence if you have no 
cards and good hp batteries you should see bars under 1 and 2, but not 0
I have just one card, a smith corona 32k ram, and I see only one bar
under the 2 slot. ( the sc card is in port 1).
btw, is anyone getting my posts? would someone kindly rply to me via 
mail..?? I would appreciate it..
thanks
jcohen@scarecrow.csee.lehigh.edu   or:
jcohen@lehi3b15.csee.lehigh.edu

akcs.xymox@hpcvbbs.UUCP (Kelvin Chang) (04/06/91)

Pardon me, but do I understand you correctly when you say that you have a
smith corona 32k ram card for the 48sx ??????
If this is true, does it work?? and is it cheaper that the 32k card from
hp?(arount 160$ I believe).
Please respond.

Kelvin.

jbaca@nmsu.edu (BACA) (04/06/91)

In article <27fd06e4:2089.10comp.sys.handhelds;1@hpcvbbs.UUCP> akcs.xymox@hpcvbbs.UUCP (Kelvin Chang) writes:
>Pardon me, but do I understand you correctly when you say that you have a
>smith corona 32k ram card for the 48sx ??????
>If this is true, does it work?? and is it cheaper that the 32k card from
>hp?(arount 160$ I believe).
>Please respond.
>
>Kelvin.

I have been using 2 Smith-Corona cards since January and have had no trouble
with these particular cards, although I did have to try several out before
I found two that would work.  Apparently, the  calculator is  somewhat
picky .  As I understand it, the HP cards are spec'ed to operate at a 
slightly lower voltage than the S-C cards.  It's purely a matter of luck to
find a card that works.  Fortunately, the people at Wal-Mart were willing to
let me try out each card until I found one that worked.  The most common
indicator that a given card would not be compatible is an "INVALID CARD 
DATA" error.  Just head to your local Wal-Mart, calculator in hand, and
surprise the clerks in the electronics department.  $23.84 for 32K ain't
bad!!!  Just be patient, though - I had to try 10 cards before I found a
couple of "good" cards.  

Of course, this is only my limited experience, and you take the life of
your calculator into your own hands......

tom baca

dave@bgtys6.uucp (Dave Hubert) (04/09/91)

In article <27fd06e4:2089.10comp.sys.handhelds;1@hpcvbbs.UUCP> akcs.xymox@hpcvbbs.UUCP (Kelvin Chang) writes:
>Pardon me, but do I understand you correctly when you say that you have a
>smith corona 32k ram card for the 48sx ??????
>If this is true, does it work?? and is it cheaper that the 32k card from
>hp?(arount 160$ I believe).
>Please respond.
>
>Kelvin.

Works for me.
-Dave.

part number S75531. Call your local typewriter store now.

akcs.xymox@hpcvbbs.UUCP (Kelvin Chang) (04/09/91)

Well, I'm heading over to the local Montgomery Wards right now! (Not
literally)  If this works, I'll be able to put as much stuff I want into
my HP as I want without having to resort to using my IBM as a backup
file system! I'll be able to carry all my cards with class notes,
programs, memos, etc.  Thanks for the info!  

Kelvin.

frechett@spot.Colorado.EDU (-=Runaway Daemon=-) (04/09/91)

In article <975@opus.NMSU.Edu> jbaca@dante.UUCP (BACA) writes:
>let me try out each card until I found one that worked.  The most common
>indicator that a given card would not be compatible is an "INVALID CARD 
>DATA" error.  Just head to your local Wal-Mart, calculator in hand, and
I am sorry that you went through so much trouble, but this isn't true.  
If it were then I would have had to send back my CMT 128K card and HP 128K
card.  They both gave me the INVALID CARD DATA when I put them in the first
time.  Actually, I have had the battery out of the HP card long enough to let
it fade away, and it gave me that error again when I put it in.  
The SC card I have also told me this.  IT is just because the card is pretty
much scrambled when you put it in the calc.  As soon as you merge it, it 
formats it to something that it likes..

As for finding BAD cards... If you put the card in the calc, turn it on 
and the screen goes black and then does the fun fading effect, then you 
know that it is bad.  Pull the card emediately.  Don't worry about 
whether the calc is on, just get the card out.  Use the reset button to 
restore it.  I had this happen once when I put the card in another person's
calc who had a VERY VERY low battery.  

	ian

-=Runaway Daemon=-

akcs.brentlz@hpcvbbs.UUCP (Brent Ellzey) (04/10/91)

Hi Kelvin, 
           If you want to find the SC ram cards cheap, try Bizmart up on 
Oracle. I picked up a pair there a month ago for $19.93 each! So far I've
experienced no problems at all with them and my batteries are over 4 
months old with relatively heavy IO usage...transferring matrices to/from
spreadsheet, backups, etc..

BrentLZ     e10140197@ccit.arizona.edu

darrylo@hpnmdla.hp.com (Darryl Okahata) (04/11/91)

In comp.sys.handhelds, frechett@spot.Colorado.EDU (-=Runaway Daemon=-) writes:

> As for finding BAD cards... If you put the card in the calc, turn it on 
> and the screen goes black and then does the fun fading effect, then you 
> know that it is bad.  Pull the card emediately.  Don't worry about 
> whether the calc is on, just get the card out.  Use the reset button to 
> restore it.  I had this happen once when I put the card in another person's
> calc who had a VERY VERY low battery.  

     I'd like to point out that "BAD cards" are probably shorting out
the calculator.  If you plug in and pull out enough of them, you will
*DAMAGE* the calculator.

     Note that non-HP-48SX cards that seem to be "good" can still
damage your calculator, if the batteries get low, or if the calculator
gets warm/hot (or it is cold?).  I've already posted and reposted the
reasons for this several times, but, if you've missed them, send email.

     -- Darryl Okahata
	UUCP: {hplabs!, hpcea!, hpfcla!} hpnmd!darrylo
	Internet: darrylo%hpnmd@relay.hp.com

DISCLAIMER: this message is the author's personal opinion and does not
constitute the support, opinion or policy of Hewlett-Packard or of the
little green men that have been following him all day.

jcohen@lehi3b15.csee.Lehigh.EDU (Josh Cohen [890918]) (04/11/91)

a card that says invalid card data is not a bad card.  All cards that are new
and never been touched can say that.. a bad card either will give an error when
you merge it or it will melt your screen when u put it in...

jcohen@scarecrow.csee.lehigh.edu

steve@gumby.Altos.COM (Steve Scherf) (04/13/91)

In article <1570024@hpnmdla.hp.com> darrylo@hpnmdla.hp.com (Darryl Okahata) writes:
>     Note that non-HP-48SX cards that seem to be "good" can still
>damage your calculator, if the batteries get low, or if the calculator
>gets warm/hot (or it is cold?).  I've already posted and reposted the
>reasons for this several times, but, if you've missed them, send email.

All of this wouldn't be a problem if HP memory was competitively priced.
My one and only real complaint against HP products is that they are largely
overpriced. I realize a lot of r&d goes into their products and they really
make the best stuff around (as far as calculators go), but I can't believe HP
needs to charge 25 bucks for a crappy plastic cover or 35 bucks for a silly
rs-232 cable to cover development cost. They certainly don't put much
development effort into their memory product; at least not more than the guys
who are charging $20 for 32K instead of $100,000 or whatever HP charges.

If they had reasonable prices I would probably buy tons of merchandise. I
spend much less now on HP products than I would if they charged less. I guess
they just don't want to go the low-margin/high-volume route.

-- 
Steve Scherf
steve@Altos.COM    ...!{sun|sco|pyramid|amdahl|uunet}!altos!steve

These opinions are solely mine, but others may share them if they like.

akcs.scotty@hpcvbbs.UUCP (SCOTTY THOMPSON) (04/14/91)

It is apparent that the vertical lines represent battery status for the
various ports/system.  However, like Derek, whenever I do the ESD test, I
get continuous beepings from my HP.  I'd like to think it was just saying
"Hi, all's fine.  Happy programming," but (call me crazy), short
high-pitched beeps in a hurried frenzy tends to make me question the
friendliness of the message...
Scott.

ahernsd@mentor.cc.purdue.edu (Dynastar) (04/14/91)

In <28073812:2089.16comp.sys.handhelds;1@hpcvbbs.UUCP> akcs.scotty@hpcvbbs.UUCP (SCOTTY THOMPSON) writes:

>It is apparent that the vertical lines represent battery status for the
>various ports/system.  However, like Derek, whenever I do the ESD test, I
>get continuous beepings from my HP.  I'd like to think it was just saying
>"Hi, all's fine.  Happy programming," but (call me crazy), short
>high-pitched beeps in a hurried frenzy tends to make me question the
>friendliness of the message...
>Scott.

My roommate and I just replaced the batteries in our two HP's at the
same time.

I did the ESD test and I got about 8 pixels on the vertical lines,
while he had no lines at all.

Could someone tell me exactly what the ESD actually does and why there
is this difference between our ESD tests?  (I have a rev E and he has
a rev C if that makes any difference.  We both have a 128K ram card.)

Thanks for the help!