matt@physics16.berkeley.edu (Matt Austern) (06/01/91)
In article <1991May31.214700.24851@leland.Stanford.EDU> mcgrant@elaine10.Stanford.EDU (Michael Grant) writes: > Now if we can just convince everyone who hates the .hp48 proposal > of this, as well as everyone who hates the .palmtops proposal, then > we can save a hell of a lot of argument and get this discussion over > with. There's enough screaming to justify two groups, that's clear. Or possibly three groups. I no longer believe that it would be stupid to create comp.sys.palmtops, comp.sys.calculators, *and* comp.sys.calculators.hp48. At any rate, I now believe that all three groups should be voted on. -- Matthew Austern Just keep yelling until you attract a (415) 644-2618 crowd, then a constituency, a movement, a austern@lbl.bitnet faction, an army! If you don't have any matt@physics.berkeley.edu solutions, become a part of the problem!
IMS103@psuvm.psu.edu (Ian Matthew Smith) (06/01/91)
matt@physics16.berkeley.edu (Matt Austern) writes: >Or possibly three groups. I no longer believe that it would be stupid >to create comp.sys.palmtops, comp.sys.calculators, *and* >comp.sys.calculators.hp48. At any rate, I now believe that all three >groups should be voted on. Why not comp.sys.calculators.hp instead of comp.sys.calculators.hp48? -- Ian Smith <<ims103@psuvm.psu.edu>>