[net.micro] Software warning for MAX-80 owners

CSvax:Pucc-H:Physics:piner@pur-ee.UUCP (06/22/83)

I just tried out my new Fortran compiler from Radio Shack
on my new MAX-80 (running under LDOS). The compiler seems
to work. But the linker crashes (rebooted system when done),
and the editor added garbage to the end of the file when it
closed the file!!! I can guess why it doesn't work. Trsdos 2.3
is unlike, LDOS, NEWDOS, or even Trsdos 6.0 (clone of LDOS?).
But you say, "I thought R.S. sells LDOS now?" They do, but why
should they worry if any of their other software runs under it.
So caveat emptor, y'all.
					Rich Piner
					Purdue Physics Dept.
P.S.
The MAX and LDOS are really very nice, it's a shame good
software is so hard to come by. Let's hope Lobo keeps their
promise, and develope their own software.

stevea@uiucdcs.UUCP (06/24/83)

#R:pur-phy:-79200:uiucdcs:10400072:000:704
uiucdcs!stevea    Jun 23 11:21:00 1983

I would bet that the editor problem is caused by a difference in the way LDOS
and TRSDOS 1.3 (as well as NEWDOS/80) keep track of the EOF in the File Control
Block.  This usually results in one extra record of crap at the end of the file
if the file does not end on a sector boundary.  Unfortunately, the only patches
that I have for any R.S. software were to make them do it the way NEWDOS does,
as opposed to the way Model I TRSDOS 2.3 did it.  The NEWDOS way is better for
variable length records, which is why Radio Shack adopted it for their COBOL
system.  It's too bad that LOBO hasn't seen the light.

					Steve Alexander
				    ...![parsec,pur-ee]!uiucdcs!stevea
				    stevea.uiuc@Rand-Relay