fjo@ttrdf.UUCP (Frank Owen ) (04/20/88)
>> >>Technical Notes 1-194 (1-183 are revised, 184-194 are new) .... >>-- >>Darin Adler, Apple Computer AppleLink:Adler4 Could some kind soul on the net please post these to this group. We have not received ANY of the notes, so I must assume that they were never posted. Thanks from all of us comp.sys.mac.programmers. -- Frank Owen (fjo@ttrdf) 312-982-2182 AT&T Information Systems Computer Systems Division, 5555 Touhy Ave., Skokie, IL 60077 PATH: ...!ihnp4!ttrdf!fjo
jellinghaus-robert@CS.YALE.EDU (Rob Jellinghaus) (04/21/88)
In article <645@ttrdf.UUCP> fjo@ttrdf.UUCP (Frank Owen ) writes: >>>Technical Notes 1-194 (1-183 are revised, 184-194 are new) .... >>>-- >>>Darin Adler, Apple Computer AppleLink:Adler4 > >Could some kind soul on the net please post these to this group. >We have not received ANY of the notes, so I must assume that they >were never posted. > >Thanks from all of us comp.sys.mac.programmers. >-- >Frank Owen (fjo@ttrdf) 312-982-2182 >AT&T Information Systems >Computer Systems Division, 5555 Touhy Ave., Skokie, IL 60077 >PATH: ...!ihnp4!ttrdf!fjo No no no! What the net REALLY needs is for someone to use StuffIt to group all these new notes into 20-note batches, and then upload them to sumex.stanford.edu. Since all these TNs are MacWrite format, and all text, Stuffit may yield compression of 50% in some cases. Any other transmission method is an inexcusable waste of bandwidth. Then, those of us who want them only have to get 10 files from sumex in order to have ALL the up-to-date notes. Posting all the tech notes to comp.binaries.mac would take a really long time; what would be the best way to get these 10 files (20 technotes each) to those of us without FTP access? Suggestions? Rob Jellinghaus | "I couldn't help it. All I could jellinghaus@yale.edu | think of was the most horrible ROBERTJ@{yalecs,yalevm}.BITNET | thing in my childhood." !..!ihnp4!hsi!yale!jellinghaus |