[comp.sys.mac.programmer] Any detailed info on CAPPS Prime...?

spector@vx2.NYU.EDU (David HM Spector) (01/04/89)

Hello,

Can anyone give me some really in-depth objective analysis of
Symantec's CAPPS Prime?  I would like to use it (or something like it)
for writing a small Application and a DA that does all of the usual
text editing stuff, plus keyword bolding, etc for certain kinds of info..

	Does it work (well, poorly, etc)?
	Does it currently work with THINK C 3.0?
	Is styled TE supported?
	Is it likely to die under the next system release?
	What are its limitations..?
	etc...

I am a very satisifed owner of THINK Pascal & C from way back to the
present, and I am sure CAPPS Prime is probably really neet since THINK
seems to do a very good job on most everything they've produced so
far, but I would like to get more info before I drop more $ into
anything... the recent round of MPW upgrades has killed my budget. :-{

Thanks Much,
  _DHMS

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
David HM Spector				   New York University
Unix Manager/Senior Systems Programmer		   Stern School of Business
ARPAnet: SPECTOR@GBA.NYU.EDU			   Academic Computing Center
USEnet:...!{uunet,rocky,harvard}!cmcl2!spector     90 Trinity Place, Rm C-4
HamRadio: N2BCA      MCIMail: DSpector             New York, New York 10006
AppleLink: D1161     CompuServe: 71260,1410        (212) 285-6080
"Capital punishment is our society's recognition of the sanctity of human life"
			- Senator Orrin Hatch

amanda@lts.UUCP (Amanda Walker) (01/04/89)

spector@vx2.NYU.EDU (David HM Spector) writes:
    Can anyone give me some really in-depth objective analysis of
    Symantec's CAPPS Prime?  I would like to use it (or something like it)
    for writing a small Application and a DA that does all of the usual
    text editing stuff, plus keyword bolding, etc for certain kinds of info..

From what you've described, Capps Prime sounds perfect for what you
want to do.

    	Does it work (well, poorly, etc)?

It works quite well, and quite quickly.

    	Does it currently work with THINK C 3.0?

Seems to for me.

    	Is styled TE supported?

Not really.  Since it's a replacement for TE (instead of a set of
patches), you don't get the nifty new features.  On the other hand,
there are a lot of hooks for embedding "escape codes" in your text
for doing things like font & style changes.  It's not quite as good
as the new TE at this (no script manager support, for example), but
it's good enough for a lot of applications, and it does do tabs and
more than 32K of text...

    	Is it likely to die under the next system release?

Well, I bought my copy back at MacWorld/Expo a year and a half ago,
and it still seems pretty happy.

    	What are its limitations..?

No Script Manager support, doesn't do variable line spacing within a
PE record (their substitute for a TE record)., will not swap parts of
the text to disk, so you're limited by available memory.  No major
limits unless you're trying to write a word processor with it.

It's well worth the price, in my opinion.

-- 
Amanda Walker			...!uunet!lts!amanda / lts!amanda@uunet.uu.net
			  InterCon, 11732 Bowman Green Drive, Reston, VA 22090
--
Calm down; it's only ones and zeros...

boz@eleazar.dartmouth.edu (John Boswell) (01/04/89)

(munch, munch)

Hi.
Just a quick question.  I've heard of CAPPS, and seen the listing for
it in MacConnection's adds.  What *is* it?

thanks,


*************************************************************************
| John Boswell   	 		boz@eleazar.dartmouth.edu	|
| Dept. of Chemistry		 	boz@dartCMS1.BITNET		|
| Dartmouth College, Hangover, Nude Hampster  03755			|

spector@vx2.NYU.EDU (David HM Spector) (01/04/89)

It's a set of libraries for THINK Pascal and THINK C that aid in the
creation of text editors and the like; it's meant as a drop-in
replacement for Apple's TextEdit package.

_DHMS
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
David HM Spector				   New York University
Unix Manager/Senior Systems Programmer		   Stern School of Business
ARPAnet: SPECTOR@GBA.NYU.EDU			   Academic Computing Center
USEnet:...!{uunet,rocky,harvard}!cmcl2!spector     90 Trinity Place, Rm C-4
HamRadio: N2BCA      MCIMail: DSpector             New York, New York 10006
AppleLink: DHMSpector   CompuServe: 71260,1410     (212) 285-6080
"Capital punishment is our society's recognition of the sanctity of human life"
			- Senator Orrin Hatch

siegel@endor.harvard.edu (Rich Siegel) (01/06/89)

In article <10006@vx2.NYU.EDU> spector@vx2.NYU.EDU (David HM Spector) writes:

>	Does it work (well, poorly, etc)?
>	Does it currently work with THINK C 3.0?
>	Is styled TE supported?
>	Is it likely to die under the next system release?
>	What are its limitations..?

	Your questions are answered simply by this:  both LightspeedC 3.0
and Lightspeed Pascal 2.0 use the Capps editor routines for their editors.
Therefore:

	It works well.
	It works with LightspeedC v3 and Lightspeed Pascal v2.
	It supports styles (though not multiple fonts).
	It works now, but I don't think it's 32-bit clean.
	It has no practical limitations.

The catch is, it's been discontinued. We are still providing technical
support for it, though, so if you are able to purchase a copy at a store
that still has some in stock, we can answer any questions that you have
about the product.


		--Rich




Rich Siegel
Staff Software Developer
THINK Technologies Division, Symantec Corp.
Internet: siegel@endor.harvard.edu
UUCP: ..harvard!endor!siegel
Phone: (617) 275-4800 x305

Any opinions stated in this article do not necessarily reflect the views
or policies of Symantec Corporation or its employees.

ts@cup.portal.com (Tim W Smith) (01/08/89)

The text editor DA that comes with CAPPS' seems to be buggy, however.
Cutting large blocks of text from it and pasting into other applications
sometimes seems to cause a crash.  Red Ryder seems particularly prone
to this crash, but I have also managed to have LightspeedC crash while
doing cut and paste operations.  Has anyone else seen this?  I have not
been able to narrow the circumstances down more than this, unfortunately.

					Tim Smith