hlee@umn-cs.CS.UMN.EDU (Chih Lee) (12/02/89)
Hi: everyone on Mac World, I love the Think Pascal and Think C compiler from Symantec company a lot. I just hope there will be Think Assembler in the future? Every time I always use Think Pascal first to write my program when assigned a homewrok, and transfer it to mainframe. Doing it saves me a lot of time debugging my program, GREAT INTERFACE & GREAT DEBUGGER. Thanks, Compiler Designers in Symantec. Lee
siegel@endor.harvard.edu (Rich Siegel) (12/05/89)
In article <17410@umn-cs.CS.UMN.EDU> hlee@umn-cs.cs.umn.edu (Huan-Chih Lee) writes: > >I love the Think Pascal and Think C compiler from Symantec company a lot. We're glad you do, and we love you too. :-) >I just hope there will be Think Assembler in the future? I can't comment on that; in the meantime, have you tried the inline assembler built into THINK C? It's fairly powerful, and in version 4.0, supports the 020 and 881 opcodes and addressing modes... > >Thanks, Compiler Designers in Symantec. You're welcome. R. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Rich Siegel Staff Software Developer Symantec Corporation, Language Products Group Internet: siegel@endor.harvard.edu UUCP: ..harvard!endor!siegel "There is no personal problem which cannot be solved by sufficient application of high explosives." ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~