[net.micro] ADAM and Cloeco

MCMANIS%usc-eclc@sri-unix.UUCP (09/30/83)

From:  Chuck McManis <MCMANIS@usc-eclc>


Sorry, that should be Coleco.

In todays (9/30/83) Wall St. Journal, is an article on some of the problems
that Coleco has been having in getting ADAM out the door. The digital cassettes
and the software are cited as the biggest hangups. From the report the
software seemed as yet to error sensitive, that is it worked if you typed
all of the right commands exactly but an error on your part in entering
commands etc could and did cause unexpected and disastrous results on the
machine, ie loss of text or lack of printing. The article also states that
to meet their deadlines Coleco has been removing undebugged functions from
the software rather than fixing them. This would be remedied by a add on
cartridge next year that will return these features to the system, no
mention of which features got yanked. I think I will wait and see if they
get any out by christmas.

				--Chuck
-------

leimkuhl@uiuccsb.UUCP (10/06/83)

#R:sri-arpa:-1218100:uiuccsb:4400014:000:743
uiuccsb!leimkuhl    Oct  5 15:23:00 1983



I saw that article too, but I didn't give the reporter much credit.  On
Friday, Coleco issued a rebuttal saying that the reporter had blatantly
misquoted one of the Coleco execs there on several points (that was in
the monday 10/3 WSJ).

I got the impression that the reporter was sort of looking for problems
with the machine and missed many of the good points (the most important
being that the machine actually performed for the first time).  The fact
that the word processing program wasn't perfect the first time it was 
demonstrated shouldn't surprise any of us who have ever used commercial
software.

The real acid test of the new machine is the BYTE review, not some un-
knowledgeable reporter's first impressions.

-Ben Leimkuhler

akhtar@uiuccsb.UUCP (10/06/83)

#R:sri-arpa:-1218100:uiuccsb:4400015:000:149
uiuccsb!akhtar    Oct  5 16:17:00 1983

The real acid test of the machine is will people buy it! Granted
it may be good, but that unfortunately has never been a sure
guarantee of success.