steelem@boulder.Colorado.EDU (STEELE MARK ALLEN) (03/06/90)
I have managed to load in a picture resource, draw it to a rectangle on an off screen bit map (I assume I am getting it drawn) I looked at the resource and it looks ok if I send it straight to the screen. So What I did then is set up a destination rectangle on the main screen and did a CopyBits to it with the following code: offScreenBitMap : BitMap; srcRect : Rect; dstRect : Rect; CopyBits(offScreenBitMap,myWindow^.portBits,srcRect,dstRect,srcCopy,NIL); and the garbage I get on the screen is incredible!! If I run the same steps in a program that draws to the screen (no windows, menus etc.) it works perfectly, why not on a window??? Question #2: Symantec advertises all the products that have been developed with think pascal and think C well what did they use to develope their languages in??? -Mark Steele
Philip.Craig@p27.f22.n282.z1.FIDONET.ORG (Philip Craig) (03/08/90)
In a message to All [06 Mar 90 06:16:00] STEELE MARK ALLEN writes: >Question #2: > Symantec advertises all the products that have been developed >with think pascal and think C well what did they use to develope >their languages >in??? Most probably, they were written in Think Pascal and Think C for the last few product evolutions. -- Philip Craig - via FidoNet node 1:282/33 UUCP: ...!uunet!imagery!22.27!Philip.Craig ARPA: Philip.Craig@p27.f22.n282.z1.FIDONET.ORG
mikem@uhccux.uhcc.hawaii.edu (Mike Morton) (03/13/90)
Philip Craig writes about Think products: >Most probably, they were written in Think Pascal and Think C for the last >few product evolutions. If memory serves, Think C was compiling itself back when it was version 1.0 (which us old-timers remember as LightspeedC). Mike Kahl says he switched from using another C (don't know which) as soon as he could bootstrap. -- Mike Morton // P.O. Box 11299, Honolulu, HI 96828, (808) 676-6966 HST Internet: mikem@uhccux.uhcc.hawaii.edu (anagrams): Mr. Machine Tool; Ethical Mormon; Chosen Immortal; etc.