HODGES@oregon.uoregon.edu (Steve Hodges, Physics, UNIV. of OR) (04/09/90)
{
I Un two recent postings, K Dobbs asks whether a
Think FORTRAN is in the works. Does anyone know? I also
would welcome such a package.
Does C or any other language allow Extende, Complex
numerical simulations as straight-forwardly as FORTRAN=77?
What if the code must ultimately be vectorized for a super?
Presently I am using Language Systems MPW/FORTRAN
for number crunching and MPW/C for instrument interfacing
(data aquisition). I am very happy with the support and software
provided by Language Systems. I am not thrilled with SADE.
Hence my interest in THINK FORTRAN!
Wisdom from more experienced programmers will be
relished!
St~reve Hodges
OPTO ERGO SUM